Is DRS or SWK cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SWK is cheaper: DRS trades at a 42.35 P/E and SWK at 34.35.

Which has grown faster, DRS or SWK?

Over the past five years, DRS grew revenue faster — DRS at a 5.14% CAGR versus SWK at 0.68%.

Does DRS or SWK pay a bigger dividend?

DRS yields 0.79% and SWK yields 3.96% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is DRS or SWK more profitable?

DRS runs the higher net margin — DRS at 7.85% versus SWK at 2.44%.

Which has been the better investment, DRS or SWK?

Over the past 10-year, DRS delivered the higher annualized total return — DRS at 43.65% versus SWK at -0.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)

SWK leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Leonardo DRS, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

$13.03B

$83.81Industrials

Total return — DRS vs SWK

growth of $100 · last 30y

DRS -28.3%SWK +184.1%SWK compounded faster

DRS SWK

DRS vs SWK: by the numbers

•SWK is the larger company ($13.03B vs $12.20B market cap).
•SWK trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.35 vs 42.35 P/E).
•DRS converts more revenue to profit (7.85% vs 2.44% net margin).
•DRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.14% vs 0.68% CAGR).
•SWK pays the higher dividend yield (3.96% vs 0.79%).

Which is better, DRS or SWK?

Metric tally: DRS 8 · SWK 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSWK(lower P/E)

GrowthDRS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSWK(higher dividend yield)

QualityDRS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	DRS	SWK
P/E ratio	42.35	34.35●
Forward P/E	31.91	15.62●
P/S ratio	3.33	0.84●
P/B ratio	4.44	1.42●
PEG ratio	1.10	0.82●
EV / EBITDA	26.84	15.06●
FCF yield	2.45%	5.68%●

Profitability

Metric	DRS	SWK
Gross margin	24.06%	30.03%●
Operating margin	9.91%●	7.79%
Net margin	7.85%●	2.44%
ROE	10.47%●	4.13%
ROIC	8.37%●	6.41%

Dividends

Metric	DRS	SWK
Dividend yield	0.79%	3.96%●
Payout ratio	34.29%	125.28%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DRS	SWK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.14%●	0.68%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.00%●	-19.52%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	21.01%●	-17.64%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	29.86%●	-12.77%

Frequently asked

Which is better, DRS or SWK?: It depends on your goal. value: SWK (lower P/E); growth: DRS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SWK (higher dividend yield); quality: DRS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SWK leads 9 to 8.
Is DRS or SWK cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SWK is cheaper: DRS trades at a 42.35 P/E and SWK at 34.35.
Which has grown faster, DRS or SWK?: Over the past five years, DRS grew revenue faster — DRS at a 5.14% CAGR versus SWK at 0.68%.
Does DRS or SWK pay a bigger dividend?: DRS yields 0.79% and SWK yields 3.96% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is DRS or SWK more profitable?: DRS runs the higher net margin — DRS at 7.85% versus SWK at 2.44%.
Which has been the better investment, DRS or SWK?: Over the past 10-year, DRS delivered the higher annualized total return — DRS at 43.65% versus SWK at -0.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DRS analysis Full SWK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Leonardo DRS P/E ratio Stanley Black & Decker P/E ratio Leonardo DRS dividend yield Stanley Black & Decker dividend yield Leonardo DRS ROE Stanley Black & Decker ROE Leonardo DRS operating margin Stanley Black & Decker operating margin Leonardo DRS revenue growth Stanley Black & Decker revenue growth Leonardo DRS free cash flow Stanley Black & Decker free cash flow

Leonardo DRS & Stanley Black & Decker appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.