Which has grown faster, DOCU or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — DOCU at a 15.12% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.

Is DOCU or WULF more profitable?

DOCU runs the higher net margin — DOCU at 9.59% versus WULF at -611.46%.

Which has been the better investment, DOCU or WULF?

Over the past 5-year, WULF delivered the higher annualized total return — DOCU at -29.22% versus WULF at 8.45%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

DOCU leads on 8 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of DocuSign, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — DOCU vs WULF

growth of $100 · last 8y

DOCU +26.9%WULF +141.7%WULF compounded faster

DOCU WULF

DOCU vs WULF: by the numbers

•WULF is the larger company ($10.35B vs $9.52B market cap).
•DOCU is profitable (9.59% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (66.83% vs 15.12% CAGR).

Which is better, DOCU or WULF?

Metric tally: DOCU 8 · WULF 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWULF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityDOCU(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	DOCU	WULF
P/E ratio	31.94	—
Forward P/E	12.99	—
P/S ratio	2.94●	55.30
P/B ratio	5.31●	62.20
EV / EBITDA	15.38	—
FCF yield	11.59%	—

Profitability

Metric	DOCU	WULF
Gross margin	79.40%●	50.93%
Operating margin	10.64%●	-101.10%
Net margin	9.59%●	-611.46%
ROE	17.32%●	-470.94%
ROIC	12.04%●	-3.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DOCU	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.12%	66.83%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.74%●	26.65%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-29.22%	4.32%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, DOCU or WULF?: It depends on your goal. growth: WULF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: DOCU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, DOCU leads 8 to 2.
Which has grown faster, DOCU or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — DOCU at a 15.12% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
Is DOCU or WULF more profitable?: DOCU runs the higher net margin — DOCU at 9.59% versus WULF at -611.46%.
Which has been the better investment, DOCU or WULF?: Over the past 5-year, WULF delivered the higher annualized total return — DOCU at -29.22% versus WULF at 8.45%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DOCU analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

DocuSign P/E ratio TeraWulf P/E ratio DocuSign dividend yield TeraWulf dividend yield DocuSign ROE TeraWulf ROE DocuSign operating margin TeraWulf operating margin DocuSign revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth DocuSign free cash flow TeraWulf free cash flow

DocuSign & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 13, 2026.