CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) vs Weyerhaeuser Company (WY)
CX leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and Weyerhaeuser Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CX
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.
$12.28Basic Materials
WY
Weyerhaeuser Company
$25.31Basic Materials
Total return — CX vs WY
growth of $100 · last 27yCX +67.3%WY -59.1%CX compounded faster
CX WY
CX vs WY: by the numbers
- •WY is the larger company ($18.25B vs $17.82B market cap).
- •CX trades at the lower earnings multiple (1.86 vs 46.02 P/E).
- •WY converts more revenue to profit (5.74% vs 2.74% net margin).
- •CX grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.55% vs -3.60% CAGR).
- •WY pays the higher dividend yield (3.32% vs 1.02%).
Which is better, CX or WY?
Metric tally: CX 12 · WY 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCX(lower P/E)
GrowthCX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWY(higher dividend yield)
QualityCX(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CX | WY |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 1.86● | 46.02 |
| Forward P/E | 13.21● | 73.57 |
| P/S ratio | 0.11● | 2.64 |
| P/B ratio | 0.13● | 1.94 |
| PEG ratio | 0.02 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 2.47● | 22.49 |
| FCF yield | 56.82% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | CX | WY |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.30%● | 13.41% |
| Operating margin | 12.07%● | 7.70% |
| Net margin | 2.74% | 5.74%● |
| ROE | 3.45% | 4.21%● |
| ROIC | 3.98%● | 2.93% |
Dividends
| Metric | CX | WY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | 3.32%● |
| Payout ratio | 1.89% | 186.67% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CX | WY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.55%● | -3.60% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 102.72%● | -15.91% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.36%● | -17.08% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.72%● | -2.57% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CX or WY?
- It depends on your goal. value: CX (lower P/E); growth: CX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WY (higher dividend yield); quality: CX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CX leads 12 to 3.
- Is CX or WY cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CX is cheaper: CX trades at a 1.86 P/E and WY at 46.02.
- Which has grown faster, CX or WY?
- Over the past five years, CX grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus WY at -3.60%.
- Does CX or WY pay a bigger dividend?
- CX yields 1.02% and WY yields 3.32% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CX or WY more profitable?
- WY runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus WY at 5.74%.
- Which has been the better investment, CX or WY?
- Over the past 10-year, CX delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.46% versus WY at 2.44%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. P/E ratioWeyerhaeuser P/E ratioCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. dividend yieldWeyerhaeuser dividend yieldCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. ROEWeyerhaeuser ROECEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. operating marginWeyerhaeuser operating marginCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. revenue growthWeyerhaeuser revenue growthCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. free cash flowWeyerhaeuser free cash flow
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. & Weyerhaeuser appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.