On trailing earnings, CX is cheaper: CX trades at a 1.69 P/E and RL at 26.74.

Which has grown faster, CX or RL?

Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.

Does CX or RL pay a bigger dividend?

CX yields 0.69% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CX or RL more profitable?

RL runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus RL at 11.60%.

Which has been the better investment, CX or RL?

Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.86% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

RL leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though CX is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.

$19.04B

$12.98Basic Materials

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$24.64B

$403.98Consumer Cyclical

Total return — CX vs RL

growth of $100 · last 27y

CX +76.8%RL +1998.6%RL compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CX RL

CX vs RL: by the numbers

•RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $19.04B market cap).
•CX trades at the lower earnings multiple (1.69 vs 26.74 P/E).
•RL converts more revenue to profit (11.60% vs 2.74% net margin).
•RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 4.55% CAGR).
•RL pays the higher dividend yield (0.90% vs 0.69%).

Which is better, CX or RL?

Metric tally: CX 8 · RL 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCX(lower P/E)

GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRL(higher dividend yield)

QualityRL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CX	RL
P/E ratio	1.69●	26.74
Forward P/E	13.96●	22.03
P/S ratio	0.11●	3.10
P/B ratio	0.14●	8.86
PEG ratio	0.02●	0.71
EV / EBITDA	3.19●	22.22
FCF yield	71.94%●	2.96%

Profitability

Metric	CX	RL
Gross margin	33.30%	69.87%●
Operating margin	12.07%	14.53%●
Net margin	2.74%	11.60%●
ROE	3.45%	33.13%●
ROIC	3.98%	19.62%●

Dividends

Metric	CX	RL
Dividend yield	0.69%	0.90%●
Payout ratio	1.36%	23.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CX	RL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.55%	13.01%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	102.72%●	20.37%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.36%	22.25%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.86%	29.56%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CX or RL?: It depends on your goal. value: CX (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RL (higher dividend yield); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 9 to 8.
Is CX or RL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CX is cheaper: CX trades at a 1.69 P/E and RL at 26.74.
Which has grown faster, CX or RL?: Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
Does CX or RL pay a bigger dividend?: CX yields 0.69% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CX or RL more profitable?: RL runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus RL at 11.60%.
Which has been the better investment, CX or RL?: Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.86% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CX analysis Full RL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. P/E ratio Ralph Lauren P/E ratio CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. dividend yield Ralph Lauren dividend yield CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. ROE Ralph Lauren ROE CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. operating margin Ralph Lauren operating margin CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. revenue growth Ralph Lauren revenue growth CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. free cash flow Ralph Lauren free cash flow

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.