Is CX or RGLD cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CX is cheaper: CX trades at a 1.87 P/E and RGLD at 23.69.

Which has grown faster, CX or RGLD?

Over the past five years, RGLD grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus RGLD at 10.85%.

Does CX or RGLD pay a bigger dividend?

CX yields 1.01% and RGLD yields 0.96% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CX or RGLD more profitable?

RGLD runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus RGLD at 48.53%.

Which has been the better investment, CX or RGLD?

Over the past 10-year, RGLD delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.01% versus RGLD at 10.51%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) vs Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD)

CX and RGLD are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.

A side-by-side comparison of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and Royal Gold, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 10, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.

$17.95B

$12.37Basic Materials

RGLD

Royal Gold, Inc.

$13.80B

$198.78Basic Materials

Total return — CX vs RGLD

growth of $100 · last 27y

CX +68.5%RGLD +4869.5%RGLD compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CX RGLD

CX vs RGLD: by the numbers

•CX is the larger company ($17.95B vs $13.80B market cap).
•CX trades at the lower earnings multiple (1.87 vs 23.69 P/E).
•RGLD converts more revenue to profit (48.53% vs 2.74% net margin).
•RGLD grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.85% vs 4.55% CAGR).
•CX pays the higher dividend yield (1.01% vs 0.96%).

Which is better, CX or RGLD?

Metric tally: CX 8 · RGLD 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCX(lower P/E)

GrowthRGLD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeCX(higher dividend yield)

QualityRGLD(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CX	RGLD
P/E ratio	1.87●	23.69
Forward P/E	15.32●	18.13
P/S ratio	0.11●	12.94
P/B ratio	0.13●	2.28
PEG ratio	0.02●	1.02
EV / EBITDA	2.47●	16.08
FCF yield	56.50%	—

Profitability

Metric	CX	RGLD
Gross margin	33.30%	68.47%●
Operating margin	12.07%	64.21%●
Net margin	2.74%	48.53%●
ROE	3.45%	8.55%●
ROIC	3.98%	5.80%●

Dividends

Metric	CX	RGLD
Dividend yield	1.01%●	0.96%
Payout ratio	1.89%	28.36%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CX	RGLD
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.55%	10.85%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	102.72%●	7.77%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.36%	13.34%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	8.61%	12.55%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CX or RGLD?: It depends on your goal. value: CX (lower P/E); growth: RGLD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CX (higher dividend yield); quality: RGLD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is CX or RGLD cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CX is cheaper: CX trades at a 1.87 P/E and RGLD at 23.69.
Which has grown faster, CX or RGLD?: Over the past five years, RGLD grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus RGLD at 10.85%.
Does CX or RGLD pay a bigger dividend?: CX yields 1.01% and RGLD yields 0.96% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CX or RGLD more profitable?: RGLD runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus RGLD at 48.53%.
Which has been the better investment, CX or RGLD?: Over the past 10-year, RGLD delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.01% versus RGLD at 10.51%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CX analysis Full RGLD analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. P/E ratio Royal Gold P/E ratio CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. dividend yield Royal Gold dividend yield CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. ROE Royal Gold ROE CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. operating margin Royal Gold operating margin CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. revenue growth Royal Gold revenue growth CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. free cash flow Royal Gold free cash flow

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. & Royal Gold appear in these rankings

Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 10, 2026.