CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) vs Nutrien Ltd. (NTR)
CX leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and Nutrien Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 18, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CX vs NTR
growth of $100 · last 8yCX +62.8%NTR +17.4%CX compounded faster
CX NTR
CX vs NTR: by the numbers
- •NTR is the larger company ($30.93B vs $18.28B market cap).
- •CX trades at the lower earnings multiple (1.64 vs 13.09 P/E).
- •NTR converts more revenue to profit (8.58% vs 2.74% net margin).
- •NTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.38% vs 4.55% CAGR).
- •NTR pays the higher dividend yield (3.40% vs 0.78%).
Which is better, CX or NTR?
Metric tally: CX 10 · NTR 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCX(lower P/E)
GrowthNTR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNTR(higher dividend yield)
QualityNTR(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 1.64● | 13.09 |
| Forward P/E | 13.54 | 12.17● |
| P/S ratio | 0.11● | 1.11 |
| P/B ratio | 0.14● | 1.23 |
| PEG ratio | 0.02● | 0.05 |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.17● | 6.99 |
| FCF yield | 74.07%● | 7.20% |
Profitability
| Metric | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.30%● | 31.16% |
| Operating margin | 12.07% | 14.15%● |
| Net margin | 2.74% | 8.58%● |
| ROE | 3.45% | 9.46%● |
| ROIC | 3.98% | 6.79%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 3.40%● |
| Payout ratio | 1.49% | 46.10% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.55% | 5.38%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 102.72%● | 41.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.36%● | 0.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.22%● | 5.10% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CX or NTR?
- It depends on your goal. value: CX (lower P/E); growth: NTR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTR (higher dividend yield); quality: NTR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CX leads 10 to 7.
- Is CX or NTR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CX is cheaper: CX trades at a 1.64 P/E and NTR at 13.09.
- Which has grown faster, CX or NTR?
- Over the past five years, NTR grew revenue faster — CX at a 4.55% CAGR versus NTR at 5.38%.
- Does CX or NTR pay a bigger dividend?
- CX yields 0.78% and NTR yields 3.40% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CX or NTR more profitable?
- NTR runs the higher net margin — CX at 2.74% versus NTR at 8.58%.
- Which has been the better investment, CX or NTR?
- Over the past 5-year, CX delivered the higher annualized total return — CX at 8.08% versus NTR at 5.10%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. P/E ratioNutrien P/E ratioCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. dividend yieldNutrien dividend yieldCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. ROENutrien ROECEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. operating marginNutrien operating marginCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. revenue growthNutrien revenue growthCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. free cash flowNutrien free cash flow
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. & Nutrien appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 18, 2026.