Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL)
CW leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
$765.13Industrials
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
$892.25Industrials
Total return — CW vs STRL
growth of $100 · last 30yCW +11440.4%STRL +71280.0%STRL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CW STRL
CW vs STRL: by the numbers
- •CW is the larger company ($28.26B vs $27.38B market cap).
- •CW trades at the lower earnings multiple (56.01 vs 79.81 P/E).
- •CW converts more revenue to profit (14.17% vs 12.02% net margin).
- •STRL grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.81% vs 8.60% CAGR).
- •CW pays a dividend (0.13% yield) while STRL does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CW or STRL?
Metric tally: CW 9 · STRL 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCW(lower P/E)
GrowthSTRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySTRL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CW | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 56.01● | 79.81 |
| Forward P/E | 44.83 | 37.10● |
| P/S ratio | 7.86● | 9.60 |
| P/B ratio | 10.77● | 23.28 |
| PEG ratio | 1.94● | 2.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 35.65● | 46.65 |
| FCF yield | 2.08%● | 1.59% |
Profitability
| Metric | CW | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.17%● | 23.29% |
| Operating margin | 18.48%● | 17.25% |
| Net margin | 14.17%● | 12.02% |
| ROE | 19.42% | 29.14%● |
| ROIC | 12.41% | 19.06%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CW | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | — |
| Payout ratio | 7.57% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CW | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.60% | 14.81%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.79% | 44.28%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.67% | 31.85%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 45.19% | 109.90%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CW or STRL?
- It depends on your goal. value: CW (lower P/E); growth: STRL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: STRL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CW leads 9 to 7.
- Is CW or STRL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CW is cheaper: CW trades at a 56.01 P/E and STRL at 79.81.
- Which has grown faster, CW or STRL?
- Over the past five years, STRL grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus STRL at 14.81%.
- Does CW or STRL pay a bigger dividend?
- CW pays a dividend (0.13% yield) while STRL does not currently pay one.
- Is CW or STRL more profitable?
- CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus STRL at 12.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, CW or STRL?
- Over the past 10-year, STRL delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 25.17% versus STRL at 67.55%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Curtiss-Wright P/E ratioSterling Infrastructure P/E ratioCurtiss-Wright dividend yieldSterling Infrastructure dividend yieldCurtiss-Wright ROESterling Infrastructure ROECurtiss-Wright operating marginSterling Infrastructure operating marginCurtiss-Wright revenue growthSterling Infrastructure revenue growthCurtiss-Wright free cash flowSterling Infrastructure free cash flow
Curtiss-Wright & Sterling Infrastructure appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.