On trailing earnings, CW is cheaper: CW trades at a 55.68 P/E and P at 117.77.

Which has grown faster, CW or P?

Over the past five years, P grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.

Does CW or P pay a bigger dividend?

CW pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while P does not currently pay one.

Is CW or P more profitable?

CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus P at 5.75%.

Which has been the better investment, CW or P?

Over the past 10-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 25.11% versus P at 21.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs Everpure, Inc. (P)

CW leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Everpure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

Total return — CW vs P

growth of $100 · last 11y

CW +1075.7%P +357.2%CW compounded faster

CW P

CW vs P: by the numbers

•CW is the larger company ($28.06B vs $26.92B market cap).
•CW trades at the lower earnings multiple (55.68 vs 117.77 P/E).
•CW converts more revenue to profit (14.17% vs 5.75% net margin).
•P grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.87% vs 8.60% CAGR).
•CW pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while P does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CW or P?

Metric tally: CW 10 · P 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCW(lower P/E)

GrowthP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CW	P
P/E ratio	55.68●	117.77
Forward P/E	49.93	39.95●
P/S ratio	7.82	6.45●
P/B ratio	10.71●	17.60
PEG ratio	1.94●	2.96
EV / EBITDA	36.75●	77.38
FCF yield	2.10%●	0.62%

Profitability

Metric	CW	P
Gross margin	37.17%	70.23%●
Operating margin	18.48%●	4.21%
Net margin	14.17%●	5.75%
ROE	19.42%●	15.69%
ROIC	12.41%●	3.43%

Dividends

Metric	CW	P
Dividend yield	0.14%	—
Payout ratio	8.04%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CW	P
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.60%	17.87%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.79%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.67%	15.82%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	45.44%●	32.78%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CW or P?: It depends on your goal. value: CW (lower P/E); growth: P (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CW leads 10 to 5.
Is CW or P cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CW is cheaper: CW trades at a 55.68 P/E and P at 117.77.
Which has grown faster, CW or P?: Over the past five years, P grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.
Does CW or P pay a bigger dividend?: CW pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while P does not currently pay one.
Is CW or P more profitable?: CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus P at 5.75%.
Which has been the better investment, CW or P?: Over the past 10-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 25.11% versus P at 21.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CW analysis Full P analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Curtiss-Wright P/E ratio Everpure P/E ratio Curtiss-Wright dividend yield Everpure dividend yield Curtiss-Wright ROE Everpure ROE Curtiss-Wright operating margin Everpure operating margin Curtiss-Wright revenue growth Everpure revenue growth Curtiss-Wright free cash flow Everpure free cash flow

Curtiss-Wright & Everpure appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.