Is CW or LII cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LII is cheaper: CW trades at a 55.49 P/E and LII at 23.07.

Which has grown faster, CW or LII?

Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus LII at 6.48%.

Does CW or LII pay a bigger dividend?

CW yields 0.16% and LII yields 1.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CW or LII more profitable?

LII runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus LII at 14.89%.

Which has been the better investment, CW or LII?

Over the past 10-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 24.85% versus LII at 15.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs Lennox International Inc. (LII)

LII leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Lennox International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

$28.00B

$758.00Industrials

LII

Lennox International Inc.

$17.82B

$512.15Industrials

Total return — CW vs LII

growth of $100 · last 27y

CW +8076.9%LII +2631.5%CW compounded faster

CW LII

CW vs LII: by the numbers

•CW is the larger company ($28.00B vs $17.82B market cap).
•LII trades at the lower earnings multiple (23.07 vs 55.49 P/E).
•LII converts more revenue to profit (14.89% vs 14.17% net margin).
•CW grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.60% vs 6.48% CAGR).
•LII pays the higher dividend yield (1.02% vs 0.16%).

Which is better, CW or LII?

Metric tally: CW 6 · LII 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLII(lower P/E)

GrowthCW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeLII(higher dividend yield)

QualityLII(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CW	LII
P/E ratio	55.49	23.07●
Forward P/E	44.41	19.23●
P/S ratio	7.79	3.41●
P/B ratio	10.67●	14.77
PEG ratio	1.94	1.21●
EV / EBITDA	35.32	17.59●
FCF yield	2.10%	3.69%●

Profitability

Metric	CW	LII
Gross margin	37.17%●	33.06%
Operating margin	18.48%	19.52%●
Net margin	14.17%	14.89%●
ROE	19.42%	64.51%●
ROIC	12.41%	25.51%●

Dividends

Metric	CW	LII
Dividend yield	0.16%	1.02%●
Payout ratio	9.43%	23.31%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CW	LII
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.60%●	6.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.79%●	19.13%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.67%●	1.44%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	43.13%●	9.91%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CW or LII?: It depends on your goal. value: LII (lower P/E); growth: CW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LII (higher dividend yield); quality: LII (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LII leads 11 to 6.
Is CW or LII cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LII is cheaper: CW trades at a 55.49 P/E and LII at 23.07.
Which has grown faster, CW or LII?: Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus LII at 6.48%.
Does CW or LII pay a bigger dividend?: CW yields 0.16% and LII yields 1.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CW or LII more profitable?: LII runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus LII at 14.89%.
Which has been the better investment, CW or LII?: Over the past 10-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 24.85% versus LII at 15.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CW analysis Full LII analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Curtiss-Wright P/E ratio Lennox International P/E ratio Curtiss-Wright dividend yield Lennox International dividend yield Curtiss-Wright ROE Lennox International ROE Curtiss-Wright operating margin Lennox International operating margin Curtiss-Wright revenue growth Lennox International revenue growth Curtiss-Wright free cash flow Lennox International free cash flow

Curtiss-Wright & Lennox International appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.