On trailing earnings, CW is cheaper: CW trades at a 54.70 P/E and IR at 54.98.

Which has grown faster, CW or IR?

Over the past five years, IR grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus IR at 10.25%.

Does CW or IR pay a bigger dividend?

CW yields 0.14% and IR yields 0.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CW or IR more profitable?

CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus IR at 7.54%.

Which has been the better investment, CW or IR?

Over the past 5-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 25.54% versus IR at 10.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR)

CW leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Ingersoll Rand Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

Total return — CW vs IR

growth of $100 · last 9y

CW +755.5%IR +285.6%CW compounded faster

CW IR

CW vs IR: by the numbers

•IR is the larger company ($31.84B vs $27.61B market cap).
•CW trades at the lower earnings multiple (54.70 vs 54.98 P/E).
•CW converts more revenue to profit (14.17% vs 7.54% net margin).
•IR grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.25% vs 8.60% CAGR).
•CW pays the higher dividend yield (0.14% vs 0.10%).

Which is better, CW or IR?

Metric tally: CW 9 · IR 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthIR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CW	IR
P/E ratio	54.70	54.98
Forward P/E	43.79	23.21●
P/S ratio	7.68	4.10●
P/B ratio	10.52	3.14●
PEG ratio	1.94●	4.99
EV / EBITDA	36.13	18.69●
FCF yield	2.13%	3.64%●

Profitability

Metric	CW	IR
Gross margin	37.17%	38.24%●
Operating margin	18.48%●	18.06%
Net margin	14.17%●	7.54%
ROE	19.42%●	5.77%
ROIC	12.41%●	6.34%

Dividends

Metric	CW	IR
Dividend yield	0.14%●	0.10%
Payout ratio	8.04%	5.48%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CW	IR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.60%	10.25%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.79%●	11.01%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.67%●	4.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	44.15%●	10.80%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CW or IR?: It depends on your goal. growth: IR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CW leads 9 to 7.
Is CW or IR cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CW is cheaper: CW trades at a 54.70 P/E and IR at 54.98.
Which has grown faster, CW or IR?: Over the past five years, IR grew revenue faster — CW at a 8.60% CAGR versus IR at 10.25%.
Does CW or IR pay a bigger dividend?: CW yields 0.14% and IR yields 0.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CW or IR more profitable?: CW runs the higher net margin — CW at 14.17% versus IR at 7.54%.
Which has been the better investment, CW or IR?: Over the past 5-year, CW delivered the higher annualized total return — CW at 25.54% versus IR at 10.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CW analysis Full IR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Curtiss-Wright P/E ratio Ingersoll Rand P/E ratio Curtiss-Wright dividend yield Ingersoll Rand dividend yield Curtiss-Wright ROE Ingersoll Rand ROE Curtiss-Wright operating margin Ingersoll Rand operating margin Curtiss-Wright revenue growth Ingersoll Rand revenue growth Curtiss-Wright free cash flow Ingersoll Rand free cash flow

Curtiss-Wright & Ingersoll Rand appear in these rankings

Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.