Carvana Co. (CVNA) vs Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW)
LOW leads on 9 of 12 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Carvana Co. and Lowe's Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CVNA
Carvana Co.
$70.04Consumer Cyclical
LOW
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
$224.02Consumer Cyclical
Total return — CVNA vs LOW
growth of $100 · last 9yCVNA +2830.0%LOW +164.8%CVNA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CVNA LOW
CVNA vs LOW: by the numbers
- •LOW is the larger company ($125.78B vs $71.60B market cap).
- •LOW trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.94 vs 35.13 P/E).
- •LOW converts more revenue to profit (7.51% vs 7.09% net margin).
- •CVNA grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.32% vs -1.28% CAGR).
- •LOW pays a dividend (2.14% yield) while CVNA does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CVNA or LOW?
Metric tally: CVNA 3 · LOW 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLOW(lower P/E)
GrowthCVNA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityLOW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CVNA | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.13 | 18.94● |
| Forward P/E | 33.68 | 16.67● |
| P/S ratio | 2.30 | 1.42● |
| P/B ratio | 13.94 | — |
| PEG ratio | 0.08● | 1.38 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 13.75 |
| FCF yield | 1.43% | 6.07%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CVNA | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 19.97% | 33.80%● |
| Operating margin | 9.19% | 11.55%● |
| Net margin | 7.09% | 7.51%● |
| ROE | 42.90%● | -67.10% |
| ROIC | -33.63% | 20.42%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CVNA | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.14% |
| Payout ratio | — | 40.44% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CVNA | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 27.32%● | -1.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 13.72% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -3.63% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.24% | 5.75%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CVNA or LOW?
- It depends on your goal. value: LOW (lower P/E); growth: CVNA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LOW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LOW leads 9 to 3.
- Is CVNA or LOW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LOW is cheaper: CVNA trades at a 35.13 P/E and LOW at 18.94.
- Which has grown faster, CVNA or LOW?
- Over the past five years, CVNA grew revenue faster — CVNA at a 27.32% CAGR versus LOW at -1.28%.
- Does CVNA or LOW pay a bigger dividend?
- LOW pays a dividend (2.14% yield) while CVNA does not currently pay one.
- Is CVNA or LOW more profitable?
- LOW runs the higher net margin — CVNA at 7.09% versus LOW at 7.51%.
- Which has been the better investment, CVNA or LOW?
- Over the past 5-year, LOW delivered the higher annualized total return — CVNA at 2.24% versus LOW at 13.19%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carvana P/E ratioLowe's Companies P/E ratioCarvana dividend yieldLowe's Companies dividend yieldCarvana ROELowe's Companies ROECarvana operating marginLowe's Companies operating marginCarvana revenue growthLowe's Companies revenue growthCarvana free cash flowLowe's Companies free cash flow
Carvana & Lowe's Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.