Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) vs Fabrinet (FN)
CTSH leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation and Fabrinet across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CTSH
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
$52.17Technology
FN
Fabrinet
$611.01Technology
Total return — CTSH vs FN
growth of $100 · last 16yCTSH +101.8%FN +5583.8%FN compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CTSH FN
CTSH vs FN: by the numbers
- •CTSH is the larger company ($24.72B vs $21.89B market cap).
- •CTSH trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.34 vs 52.49 P/E).
- •CTSH converts more revenue to profit (10.41% vs 9.87% net margin).
- •FN grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.99% vs 4.93% CAGR).
- •CTSH pays a dividend (2.45% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CTSH or FN?
Metric tally: CTSH 10 · FN 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCTSH(lower P/E)
GrowthFN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityFN(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CTSH | FN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.34● | 52.49 |
| Forward P/E | 9.13● | 44.26 |
| P/S ratio | 1.16● | 5.23 |
| P/B ratio | 1.65● | 9.60 |
| PEG ratio | 20.23 | 2.47● |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.02● | 42.67 |
| FCF yield | 9.93%● | 0.21% |
Profitability
| Metric | CTSH | FN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 32.06%● | 11.96% |
| Operating margin | 15.66%● | 9.78% |
| Net margin | 10.41%● | 9.87% |
| ROE | 14.79% | 18.14%● |
| ROIC | 12.31% | 15.01%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CTSH | FN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.45% | — |
| Payout ratio | 28.07% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CTSH | FN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.93% | 18.99%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.07% | 24.62%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.09%● | -9.50% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -4.48% | 45.36%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CTSH or FN?
- It depends on your goal. value: CTSH (lower P/E); growth: FN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CTSH leads 10 to 6.
- Is CTSH or FN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CTSH is cheaper: CTSH trades at a 11.34 P/E and FN at 52.49.
- Which has grown faster, CTSH or FN?
- Over the past five years, FN grew revenue faster — CTSH at a 4.93% CAGR versus FN at 18.99%.
- Does CTSH or FN pay a bigger dividend?
- CTSH pays a dividend (2.45% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.
- Is CTSH or FN more profitable?
- CTSH runs the higher net margin — CTSH at 10.41% versus FN at 9.87%.
- Which has been the better investment, CTSH or FN?
- Over the past 10-year, FN delivered the higher annualized total return — CTSH at -0.12% versus FN at 32.51%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cognizant Technology Solutions P/E ratioFabrinet P/E ratioCognizant Technology Solutions dividend yieldFabrinet dividend yieldCognizant Technology Solutions ROEFabrinet ROECognizant Technology Solutions operating marginFabrinet operating marginCognizant Technology Solutions revenue growthFabrinet revenue growthCognizant Technology Solutions free cash flowFabrinet free cash flow
Cognizant Technology Solutions & Fabrinet appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.