Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) vs Weatherford International plc (WFRD)
CTRA leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics, though WFRD is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Coterra Energy Inc. and Weatherford International plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CTRA vs WFRD
growth of $100 · last 6yCTRA +87.0%WFRD +317.6%WFRD compounded faster
CTRA WFRD
CTRA vs WFRD: by the numbers
- •CTRA is the larger company ($24.72B vs $6.59B market cap).
- •WFRD trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.34 vs 14.94 P/E).
- •CTRA converts more revenue to profit (21.68% vs 9.49% net margin).
- •CTRA grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.93% vs 8.11% CAGR).
- •CTRA pays the higher dividend yield (2.03% vs 1.15%).
Which is better, CTRA or WFRD?
Metric tally: CTRA 10 · WFRD 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWFRD(lower P/E)
GrowthCTRA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCTRA(higher dividend yield)
QualityWFRD(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CTRA | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.94 | 14.34● |
| Forward P/E | 11.15● | 15.52 |
| P/S ratio | 3.23 | 1.36● |
| P/B ratio | 1.64● | 3.76 |
| PEG ratio | 0.24 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.76● | 7.41 |
| FCF yield | 8.01%● | 7.04% |
Profitability
| Metric | CTRA | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.00% | 45.89%● |
| Operating margin | 31.10%● | 15.11% |
| Net margin | 21.68%● | 9.49% |
| ROE | 11.03% | 26.34%● |
| ROIC | 8.00% | 16.68%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CTRA | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.03%● | 1.15% |
| Payout ratio | 29.33% | 17.62% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CTRA | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.93%● | 8.11% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 35.10%● | -30.28% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 44.75%● | 30.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.43% | 39.42%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CTRA or WFRD?
- It depends on your goal. value: WFRD (lower P/E); growth: CTRA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CTRA (higher dividend yield); quality: WFRD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CTRA leads 10 to 6.
- Is CTRA or WFRD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WFRD is cheaper: CTRA trades at a 14.94 P/E and WFRD at 14.34.
- Which has grown faster, CTRA or WFRD?
- Over the past five years, CTRA grew revenue faster — CTRA at a 37.93% CAGR versus WFRD at 8.11%.
- Does CTRA or WFRD pay a bigger dividend?
- CTRA yields 2.03% and WFRD yields 1.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CTRA or WFRD more profitable?
- CTRA runs the higher net margin — CTRA at 21.68% versus WFRD at 9.49%.
- Which has been the better investment, CTRA or WFRD?
- Over the past 5-year, WFRD delivered the higher annualized total return — CTRA at 6.59% versus WFRD at 39.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Coterra Energy P/E ratioWeatherford International P/E ratioCoterra Energy dividend yieldWeatherford International dividend yieldCoterra Energy ROEWeatherford International ROECoterra Energy operating marginWeatherford International operating marginCoterra Energy revenue growthWeatherford International revenue growthCoterra Energy free cash flowWeatherford International free cash flow
Coterra Energy & Weatherford International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.