Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) vs Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)
CTRA leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Coterra Energy Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CTRA vs TPL
growth of $100 · last 30yCTRA +2176.9%TPL +64147.8%TPL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CTRA TPL
CTRA vs TPL: by the numbers
- •TPL is the larger company ($27.30B vs $24.72B market cap).
- •CTRA trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.94 vs 54.27 P/E).
- •TPL converts more revenue to profit (60.03% vs 21.68% net margin).
- •CTRA grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.93% vs 23.67% CAGR).
- •CTRA pays the higher dividend yield (2.70% vs 0.61%).
Which is better, CTRA or TPL?
Metric tally: CTRA 12 · TPL 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCTRA(lower P/E)
GrowthCTRA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCTRA(higher dividend yield)
QualityTPL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CTRA | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.94● | 54.27 |
| Forward P/E | 11.15● | 43.17 |
| P/S ratio | 3.23● | 32.55 |
| P/B ratio | 1.64● | 17.55 |
| PEG ratio | 0.24● | 6.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.79● | 39.30 |
| FCF yield | 8.01%● | 1.81% |
Profitability
| Metric | CTRA | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.00% | 85.46%● |
| Operating margin | 31.10% | 74.42%● |
| Net margin | 21.68% | 60.03%● |
| ROE | 11.03% | 32.37%● |
| ROIC | 8.00% | 30.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CTRA | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.70%● | 0.61% |
| Payout ratio | 39.11% | 34.38% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CTRA | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.93%● | 23.67% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 35.10%● | 22.57% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 44.75%● | 18.77% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.24%● | 18.39% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CTRA or TPL?
- It depends on your goal. value: CTRA (lower P/E); growth: CTRA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CTRA (higher dividend yield); quality: TPL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CTRA leads 12 to 5.
- Is CTRA or TPL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CTRA is cheaper: CTRA trades at a 14.94 P/E and TPL at 54.27.
- Which has grown faster, CTRA or TPL?
- Over the past five years, CTRA grew revenue faster — CTRA at a 37.93% CAGR versus TPL at 23.67%.
- Does CTRA or TPL pay a bigger dividend?
- CTRA yields 2.70% and TPL yields 0.61% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CTRA or TPL more profitable?
- TPL runs the higher net margin — CTRA at 21.68% versus TPL at 60.03%.
- Which has been the better investment, CTRA or TPL?
- Over the past 10-year, TPL delivered the higher annualized total return — CTRA at 6.50% versus TPL at 37.72%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Coterra Energy P/E ratioTexas Pacific Land P/E ratioCoterra Energy dividend yieldTexas Pacific Land dividend yieldCoterra Energy ROETexas Pacific Land ROECoterra Energy operating marginTexas Pacific Land operating marginCoterra Energy revenue growthTexas Pacific Land revenue growthCoterra Energy free cash flowTexas Pacific Land free cash flow
Coterra Energy & Texas Pacific Land appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.