Which has grown faster, CTRA or HP?

Over the past five years, CTRA grew revenue faster — CTRA at a 37.93% CAGR versus HP at 30.24%.

Does CTRA or HP pay a bigger dividend?

CTRA yields 2.03% and HP yields 2.86% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CTRA or HP more profitable?

CTRA runs the higher net margin — CTRA at 21.68% versus HP at -9.39%.

Which has been the better investment, CTRA or HP?

Over the past 10-year, CTRA delivered the higher annualized total return — CTRA at 6.59% versus HP at -1.63%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) vs Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP)

CTRA leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Coterra Energy Inc. and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

$3.49B

$34.97Energy

Total return — CTRA vs HP

growth of $100 · last 30y

CTRA +2385.5%HP +544.5%CTRA compounded faster

CTRA HP

CTRA vs HP: by the numbers

•CTRA is the larger company ($24.72B vs $3.49B market cap).
•CTRA is profitable (21.68% net margin) while HP runs a net loss (-9.39%).
•CTRA grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.93% vs 30.24% CAGR).
•HP pays the higher dividend yield (2.86% vs 2.03%).

Which is better, CTRA or HP?

Metric tally: CTRA 12 · HP 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthCTRA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeHP(higher dividend yield)

QualityCTRA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CTRA	HP
P/E ratio	14.94	—
Forward P/E	11.15●	22.15
P/S ratio	3.23	0.87●
P/B ratio	1.64	1.38●
PEG ratio	0.24	—
EV / EBITDA	5.76●	10.29
FCF yield	8.01%●	7.33%

Profitability

Metric	CTRA	HP
Gross margin	39.00%●	11.29%
Operating margin	31.10%●	-1.85%
Net margin	21.68%●	-9.39%
ROE	11.03%●	-14.86%
ROIC	8.00%●	3.92%

Dividends

Metric	CTRA	HP
Dividend yield	2.03%	2.86%●
Payout ratio	29.33%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CTRA	HP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	37.93%●	30.24%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	35.10%●	-4.17%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	44.75%●	-2.32%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	19.43%●	6.04%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CTRA or HP?: It depends on your goal. growth: CTRA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: HP (higher dividend yield); quality: CTRA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CTRA leads 12 to 3.
Which has grown faster, CTRA or HP?: Over the past five years, CTRA grew revenue faster — CTRA at a 37.93% CAGR versus HP at 30.24%.
Does CTRA or HP pay a bigger dividend?: CTRA yields 2.03% and HP yields 2.86% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CTRA or HP more profitable?: CTRA runs the higher net margin — CTRA at 21.68% versus HP at -9.39%.
Which has been the better investment, CTRA or HP?: Over the past 10-year, CTRA delivered the higher annualized total return — CTRA at 6.59% versus HP at -1.63%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CTRA analysis Full HP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Coterra Energy P/E ratio Helmerich & Payne P/E ratio Coterra Energy dividend yield Helmerich & Payne dividend yield Coterra Energy ROE Helmerich & Payne ROE Coterra Energy operating margin Helmerich & Payne operating margin Coterra Energy revenue growth Helmerich & Payne revenue growth Coterra Energy free cash flow Helmerich & Payne free cash flow

Coterra Energy & Helmerich & Payne appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.