Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) vs First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)
CTRA and FSLR are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Coterra Energy Inc. and First Solar, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CTRA vs FSLR
growth of $100 · last 19yCTRA +356.0%FSLR +767.3%FSLR compounded faster
CTRA FSLR
CTRA vs FSLR: by the numbers
- •FSLR is the larger company ($26.72B vs $24.72B market cap).
- •CTRA trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.94 vs 16.06 P/E).
- •FSLR converts more revenue to profit (30.73% vs 21.68% net margin).
- •CTRA grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.93% vs 12.69% CAGR).
- •CTRA pays a dividend (2.03% yield) while FSLR does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CTRA or FSLR?
Metric tally: CTRA 8 · FSLR 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCTRA(lower P/E)
GrowthCTRA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityFSLR(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CTRA | FSLR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.94● | 16.06 |
| Forward P/E | 11.15 | 10.33● |
| P/S ratio | 3.23● | 4.94 |
| P/B ratio | 1.64● | 2.71 |
| PEG ratio | 0.24● | 1.01 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.76● | 10.74 |
| FCF yield | 8.01%● | 6.23% |
Profitability
| Metric | CTRA | FSLR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.00% | 41.73%● |
| Operating margin | 31.10% | 33.17%● |
| Net margin | 21.68% | 30.73%● |
| ROE | 11.03% | 16.86%● |
| ROIC | 8.00% | 14.42%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CTRA | FSLR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | — |
| Payout ratio | 29.33% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CTRA | FSLR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.93%● | 12.69% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 35.10%● | 30.54% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 44.75% | 55.54%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.43% | 23.13%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CTRA or FSLR?
- It depends on your goal. value: CTRA (lower P/E); growth: CTRA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FSLR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is CTRA or FSLR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CTRA is cheaper: CTRA trades at a 14.94 P/E and FSLR at 16.06.
- Which has grown faster, CTRA or FSLR?
- Over the past five years, CTRA grew revenue faster — CTRA at a 37.93% CAGR versus FSLR at 12.69%.
- Does CTRA or FSLR pay a bigger dividend?
- CTRA pays a dividend (2.03% yield) while FSLR does not currently pay one.
- Is CTRA or FSLR more profitable?
- FSLR runs the higher net margin — CTRA at 21.68% versus FSLR at 30.73%.
- Which has been the better investment, CTRA or FSLR?
- Over the past 10-year, FSLR delivered the higher annualized total return — CTRA at 6.59% versus FSLR at 18.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Coterra Energy P/E ratioFirst Solar P/E ratioCoterra Energy dividend yieldFirst Solar dividend yieldCoterra Energy ROEFirst Solar ROECoterra Energy operating marginFirst Solar operating marginCoterra Energy revenue growthFirst Solar revenue growthCoterra Energy free cash flowFirst Solar free cash flow
Coterra Energy & First Solar appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.