Cintas Corporation (CTAS) vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX)
CTAS leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics, though LHX is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Cintas Corporation and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
$169.64Industrials
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
$310.45Industrials
Total return — CTAS vs LHX
growth of $100 · last 30yCTAS +3783.1%LHX +2367.8%CTAS compounded faster
CTAS LHX
CTAS vs LHX: by the numbers
- •CTAS is the larger company ($67.88B vs $57.84B market cap).
- •LHX trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.71 vs 35.79 P/E).
- •CTAS converts more revenue to profit (17.57% vs 7.71% net margin).
- •CTAS grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.83% vs 4.38% CAGR).
- •LHX pays the higher dividend yield (1.58% vs 1.06%).
Which is better, CTAS or LHX?
Metric tally: CTAS 10 · LHX 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLHX(lower P/E)
GrowthCTAS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLHX(higher dividend yield)
QualityCTAS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CTAS | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.79 | 33.71● |
| Forward P/E | 31.20 | 22.72● |
| P/S ratio | 6.26 | 2.60● |
| P/B ratio | 14.41 | 2.97● |
| PEG ratio | 3.08● | 4.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.60 | 17.98● |
| FCF yield | 2.59% | 4.43%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CTAS | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.36%● | 25.26% |
| Operating margin | 22.95%● | 9.93% |
| Net margin | 17.57%● | 7.71% |
| ROE | 40.46%● | 8.80% |
| ROIC | 22.95%● | 5.14% |
Dividends
| Metric | CTAS | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 1.58%● |
| Payout ratio | 40.18% | 57.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CTAS | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.83%● | 4.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.48%● | 10.38% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.81%● | 0.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.47%● | 9.08% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CTAS or LHX?
- It depends on your goal. value: LHX (lower P/E); growth: CTAS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LHX (higher dividend yield); quality: CTAS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CTAS leads 10 to 7.
- Is CTAS or LHX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LHX is cheaper: CTAS trades at a 35.79 P/E and LHX at 33.71.
- Which has grown faster, CTAS or LHX?
- Over the past five years, CTAS grew revenue faster — CTAS at a 9.83% CAGR versus LHX at 4.38%.
- Does CTAS or LHX pay a bigger dividend?
- CTAS yields 1.06% and LHX yields 1.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CTAS or LHX more profitable?
- CTAS runs the higher net margin — CTAS at 17.57% versus LHX at 7.71%.
- Which has been the better investment, CTAS or LHX?
- Over the past 10-year, CTAS delivered the higher annualized total return — CTAS at 23.15% versus LHX at 16.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cintas P/E ratioL3Harris Technologies P/E ratioCintas dividend yieldL3Harris Technologies dividend yieldCintas ROEL3Harris Technologies ROECintas operating marginL3Harris Technologies operating marginCintas revenue growthL3Harris Technologies revenue growthCintas free cash flowL3Harris Technologies free cash flow
Cintas & L3Harris Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.