Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Xylem Inc. (XYL)
CRS leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though XYL is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Xylem Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CRS vs XYL
growth of $100 · last 15yCRS +1059.6%XYL +365.5%CRS compounded faster
CRS XYL
CRS vs XYL: by the numbers
- •CRS is the larger company ($27.90B vs $26.80B market cap).
- •XYL trades at the lower earnings multiple (27.60 vs 59.11 P/E).
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (15.82% vs 10.70% net margin).
- •CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.23% vs 12.66% CAGR).
- •XYL pays the higher dividend yield (1.50% vs 0.14%).
Which is better, CRS or XYL?
Metric tally: CRS 9 · XYL 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueXYL(lower P/E)
GrowthCRS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeXYL(higher dividend yield)
QualityCRS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 59.11 | 27.60● |
| Forward P/E | 44.62 | 20.05● |
| P/S ratio | 9.33 | 2.97● |
| P/B ratio | 13.66 | 2.46● |
| PEG ratio | 0.37● | 4.89 |
| EV / EBITDA | 36.68 | 15.68● |
| FCF yield | 1.44% | 3.58%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.73% | 38.61%● |
| Operating margin | 21.34%● | 13.60% |
| Net margin | 15.82%● | 10.70% |
| ROE | 23.17%● | 8.87% |
| ROIC | 13.94%● | 6.37% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 1.50%● |
| Payout ratio | 10.68% | 42.24% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.23%● | 12.66% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 218.42%● | 22.76% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.57%● | 8.96% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 69.74%● | 0.75% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRS or XYL?
- It depends on your goal. value: XYL (lower P/E); growth: CRS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: XYL (higher dividend yield); quality: CRS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CRS leads 9 to 8.
- Is CRS or XYL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, XYL is cheaper: CRS trades at a 59.11 P/E and XYL at 27.60.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or XYL?
- Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus XYL at 12.66%.
- Does CRS or XYL pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS yields 0.14% and XYL yields 1.50% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRS or XYL more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus XYL at 10.70%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRS or XYL?
- Over the past 10-year, CRS delivered the higher annualized total return — CRS at 34.71% versus XYL at 10.89%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioXylem P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldXylem dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROEXylem ROECarpenter Technology operating marginXylem operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthXylem revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowXylem free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & Xylem appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.