Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL)
CRS leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$580.95Industrials
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
$867.23Industrials
Total return — CRS vs STRL
growth of $100 · last 30yCRS +3356.0%STRL +72929.9%STRL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRS STRL
CRS vs STRL: by the numbers
- •CRS is the larger company ($28.86B vs $26.61B market cap).
- •CRS trades at the lower earnings multiple (61.15 vs 77.57 P/E).
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (15.82% vs 12.02% net margin).
- •CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.23% vs 14.81% CAGR).
- •CRS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while STRL does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CRS or STRL?
Metric tally: CRS 9 · STRL 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCRS(lower P/E)
GrowthCRS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySTRL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 61.15● | 77.57 |
| Forward P/E | 46.15 | 36.06● |
| P/S ratio | 9.65 | 9.33● |
| P/B ratio | 14.13● | 22.63 |
| PEG ratio | 0.37● | 2.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 37.93● | 45.34 |
| FCF yield | 1.39% | 1.64%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.73%● | 23.29% |
| Operating margin | 21.34%● | 17.25% |
| Net margin | 15.82%● | 12.02% |
| ROE | 23.17% | 29.14%● |
| ROIC | 13.94% | 19.06%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | — |
| Payout ratio | 10.68% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.23%● | 14.81% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 218.42%● | 44.28% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.57% | 31.85%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 71.60% | 106.41%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRS or STRL?
- It depends on your goal. value: CRS (lower P/E); growth: CRS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: STRL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CRS leads 9 to 7.
- Is CRS or STRL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CRS is cheaper: CRS trades at a 61.15 P/E and STRL at 77.57.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or STRL?
- Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus STRL at 14.81%.
- Does CRS or STRL pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while STRL does not currently pay one.
- Is CRS or STRL more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus STRL at 12.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRS or STRL?
- Over the past 10-year, STRL delivered the higher annualized total return — CRS at 36.23% versus STRL at 67.41%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioSterling Infrastructure P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldSterling Infrastructure dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROESterling Infrastructure ROECarpenter Technology operating marginSterling Infrastructure operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthSterling Infrastructure revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowSterling Infrastructure free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & Sterling Infrastructure appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.