Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Everpure, Inc. (P)
CRS leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Everpure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CRS vs P
growth of $100 · last 11yCRS +1661.5%P +357.2%CRS compounded faster
CRS P
CRS vs P: by the numbers
- •CRS is the larger company ($29.36B vs $26.92B market cap).
- •CRS trades at the lower earnings multiple (61.86 vs 117.77 P/E).
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (15.82% vs 5.75% net margin).
- •P grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.87% vs 15.23% CAGR).
- •CRS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while P does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CRS or P?
Metric tally: CRS 10 · P 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCRS(lower P/E)
GrowthP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCRS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | P |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 61.86● | 117.77 |
| Forward P/E | 55.55 | 39.95● |
| P/S ratio | 9.76 | 6.45● |
| P/B ratio | 14.30● | 17.60 |
| PEG ratio | 0.37● | 2.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 37.89● | 77.38 |
| FCF yield | 1.38%● | 0.62% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | P |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.73% | 70.23%● |
| Operating margin | 21.34%● | 4.21% |
| Net margin | 15.82%● | 5.75% |
| ROE | 23.17%● | 15.69% |
| ROIC | 13.94%● | 3.43% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | P |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | — |
| Payout ratio | 10.68% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | P |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.23% | 17.87%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 218.42% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.57% | 15.82%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 75.17%● | 32.78% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRS or P?
- It depends on your goal. value: CRS (lower P/E); growth: P (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CRS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CRS leads 10 to 5.
- Is CRS or P cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CRS is cheaper: CRS trades at a 61.86 P/E and P at 117.77.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or P?
- Over the past five years, P grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.
- Does CRS or P pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while P does not currently pay one.
- Is CRS or P more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus P at 5.75%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRS or P?
- Over the past 10-year, CRS delivered the higher annualized total return — CRS at 34.27% versus P at 21.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioEverpure P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldEverpure dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROEEverpure ROECarpenter Technology operating marginEverpure operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthEverpure revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowEverpure free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & Everpure appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.