Is CRS or NVT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NVT is cheaper: CRS trades at a 63.08 P/E and NVT at 57.30.

Which has grown faster, CRS or NVT?

Over the past five years, NVT grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus NVT at 16.38%.

Does CRS or NVT pay a bigger dividend?

CRS yields 0.13% and NVT yields 0.48% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CRS or NVT more profitable?

CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus NVT at 11.33%.

Which has been the better investment, CRS or NVT?

Over the past 5-year, NVT delivered the higher annualized total return — CRS at 36.65% versus NVT at 42.38%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs nVent Electric plc (NVT)

NVT leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and nVent Electric plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CRS

Carpenter Technology Corporation

Total return — CRS vs NVT

growth of $100 · last 8y

CRS +1097.3%NVT +574.2%CRS compounded faster

CRS NVT

CRS vs NVT: by the numbers

•CRS is the larger company ($29.77B vs $27.80B market cap).
•NVT trades at the lower earnings multiple (57.30 vs 63.08 P/E).
•CRS converts more revenue to profit (15.82% vs 11.33% net margin).
•NVT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.38% vs 15.23% CAGR).
•NVT pays the higher dividend yield (0.48% vs 0.13%).

Which is better, CRS or NVT?

Metric tally: CRS 7 · NVT 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNVT(lower P/E)

GrowthNVT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCRS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CRS	NVT
P/E ratio	63.08	57.30●
Forward P/E	47.61	30.05●
P/S ratio	9.95	6.52●
P/B ratio	14.58	7.43●
PEG ratio	0.37	0.20●
EV / EBITDA	39.11	32.49●
FCF yield	1.35%	1.35%

Profitability

Metric	CRS	NVT
Gross margin	29.73%	37.01%●
Operating margin	21.34%●	15.92%
Net margin	15.82%●	11.33%
ROE	23.17%●	12.91%
ROIC	13.94%●	8.15%

Dividends

Metric	CRS	NVT
Dividend yield	0.13%	0.48%●
Payout ratio	10.68%	18.81%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CRS	NVT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.23%	16.38%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	218.42%●	22.34%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.57%●	1.91%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	73.66%●	42.38%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CRS or NVT?: It depends on your goal. value: NVT (lower P/E); growth: NVT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CRS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVT leads 9 to 7.
Is CRS or NVT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NVT is cheaper: CRS trades at a 63.08 P/E and NVT at 57.30.
Which has grown faster, CRS or NVT?: Over the past five years, NVT grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus NVT at 16.38%.
Does CRS or NVT pay a bigger dividend?: CRS yields 0.13% and NVT yields 0.48% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CRS or NVT more profitable?: CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus NVT at 11.33%.
Which has been the better investment, CRS or NVT?: Over the past 5-year, NVT delivered the higher annualized total return — CRS at 36.65% versus NVT at 42.38%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CRS analysis Full NVT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Carpenter Technology P/E ratio nVent Electric P/E ratio Carpenter Technology dividend yield nVent Electric dividend yield Carpenter Technology ROE nVent Electric ROE Carpenter Technology operating margin nVent Electric operating margin Carpenter Technology revenue growth nVent Electric revenue growth Carpenter Technology free cash flow nVent Electric free cash flow

Carpenter Technology & nVent Electric appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.