Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs MasTec, Inc. (MTZ)
CRS leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and MasTec, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$578.12Industrials
MTZ
MasTec, Inc.
$393.14Industrials
Total return — CRS vs MTZ
growth of $100 · last 30yCRS +3363.9%MTZ +3278.8%CRS compounded faster
CRS MTZ
CRS vs MTZ: by the numbers
- •MTZ is the larger company ($31.07B vs $28.72B market cap).
- •CRS trades at the lower earnings multiple (60.85 vs 68.85 P/E).
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (15.82% vs 3.00% net margin).
- •MTZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.00% vs 15.23% CAGR).
- •CRS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while MTZ does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CRS or MTZ?
Metric tally: CRS 10 · MTZ 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCRS(lower P/E)
GrowthMTZ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCRS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 60.85● | 68.85 |
| Forward P/E | 45.93 | 33.77● |
| P/S ratio | 9.60 | 2.03● |
| P/B ratio | 14.06 | 9.36● |
| PEG ratio | 0.37 | 0.29● |
| EV / EBITDA | 37.75 | 29.66● |
| FCF yield | 1.40%● | 0.83% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.73%● | 11.30% |
| Operating margin | 21.34%● | 5.65% |
| Net margin | 15.82%● | 3.00% |
| ROE | 23.17%● | 13.86% |
| ROIC | 13.94%● | 7.44% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | — |
| Payout ratio | 10.68% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.23% | 18.00%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 218.42%● | 2.94% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.57%● | -19.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 72.74%● | 29.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRS or MTZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: CRS (lower P/E); growth: MTZ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CRS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CRS leads 10 to 6.
- Is CRS or MTZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CRS is cheaper: CRS trades at a 60.85 P/E and MTZ at 68.85.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or MTZ?
- Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus MTZ at 18.00%.
- Does CRS or MTZ pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while MTZ does not currently pay one.
- Is CRS or MTZ more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus MTZ at 3.00%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRS or MTZ?
- Over the past 10-year, CRS delivered the higher annualized total return — CRS at 34.88% versus MTZ at 33.32%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioMasTec P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldMasTec dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROEMasTec ROECarpenter Technology operating marginMasTec operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthMasTec revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowMasTec free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & MasTec appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.