Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR)
CRS leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics, though IR is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Ingersoll Rand Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$591.78Industrials
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
$81.37Industrials
Total return — CRS vs IR
growth of $100 · last 9yCRS +1569.8%IR +285.6%CRS compounded faster
CRS IR
CRS vs IR: by the numbers
- •IR is the larger company ($31.84B vs $29.40B market cap).
- •IR trades at the lower earnings multiple (54.98 vs 62.29 P/E).
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (15.82% vs 7.54% net margin).
- •CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.23% vs 10.25% CAGR).
- •CRS pays the higher dividend yield (0.14% vs 0.10%).
Which is better, CRS or IR?
Metric tally: CRS 10 · IR 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueIR(lower P/E)
GrowthCRS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCRS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | IR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 62.29 | 54.98● |
| Forward P/E | 47.01 | 23.21● |
| P/S ratio | 9.83 | 4.10● |
| P/B ratio | 14.40 | 3.14● |
| PEG ratio | 0.37● | 4.99 |
| EV / EBITDA | 38.15 | 18.69● |
| FCF yield | 1.37% | 3.64%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.73% | 38.24%● |
| Operating margin | 21.34%● | 18.06% |
| Net margin | 15.82%● | 7.54% |
| ROE | 23.17%● | 5.77% |
| ROIC | 13.94%● | 6.34% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14%● | 0.10% |
| Payout ratio | 10.68% | 5.48% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.23%● | 10.25% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 218.42%● | 11.01% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.57%● | 4.93% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 73.17%● | 10.80% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRS or IR?
- It depends on your goal. value: IR (lower P/E); growth: CRS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CRS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CRS leads 10 to 7.
- Is CRS or IR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, IR is cheaper: CRS trades at a 62.29 P/E and IR at 54.98.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or IR?
- Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus IR at 10.25%.
- Does CRS or IR pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS yields 0.14% and IR yields 0.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRS or IR more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus IR at 7.54%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRS or IR?
- Over the past 5-year, CRS delivered the higher annualized total return — CRS at 36.46% versus IR at 10.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioIngersoll Rand P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldIngersoll Rand dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROEIngersoll Rand ROECarpenter Technology operating marginIngersoll Rand operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthIngersoll Rand revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowIngersoll Rand free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & Ingersoll Rand appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.