Is CRS or HUBB cheaper?

On trailing earnings, HUBB is cheaper: CRS trades at a 59.11 P/E and HUBB at 29.69.

Which has grown faster, CRS or HUBB?

Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus HUBB at 8.15%.

Does CRS or HUBB pay a bigger dividend?

CRS yields 0.14% and HUBB yields 1.11% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CRS or HUBB more profitable?

CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus HUBB at 15.10%.

Which has been the better investment, CRS or HUBB?

Over the past 10-year, CRS delivered the higher annualized total return — CRS at 34.71% versus HUBB at 19.78%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB)

HUBB leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Hubbell Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CRS

Carpenter Technology Corporation

Total return — CRS vs HUBB

growth of $100 · last 30y

CRS +3303.6%HUBB +1326.0%CRS compounded faster

CRS HUBB

CRS vs HUBB: by the numbers

•CRS is the larger company ($27.90B vs $26.56B market cap).
•HUBB trades at the lower earnings multiple (29.69 vs 59.11 P/E).
•CRS converts more revenue to profit (15.82% vs 15.10% net margin).
•CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.23% vs 8.15% CAGR).
•HUBB pays the higher dividend yield (1.11% vs 0.14%).

Which is better, CRS or HUBB?

Metric tally: CRS 7 · HUBB 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueHUBB(lower P/E)

GrowthCRS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeHUBB(higher dividend yield)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CRS	HUBB
P/E ratio	59.11	29.69●
Forward P/E	44.62	25.44●
P/S ratio	9.33	4.47●
P/B ratio	13.66	7.09●
PEG ratio	0.37●	1.78
EV / EBITDA	36.68	20.22●
FCF yield	1.44%	3.39%●

Profitability

Metric	CRS	HUBB
Gross margin	29.73%	35.52%●
Operating margin	21.34%●	20.77%
Net margin	15.82%●	15.10%
ROE	23.17%	23.97%●
ROIC	13.94%	13.76%

Dividends

Metric	CRS	HUBB
Dividend yield	0.14%	1.11%●
Payout ratio	10.68%	33.55%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CRS	HUBB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.23%●	8.15%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	218.42%●	20.82%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.57%●	12.34%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	69.74%●	24.52%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CRS or HUBB?: It depends on your goal. value: HUBB (lower P/E); growth: CRS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: HUBB (higher dividend yield). Across all compared metrics, HUBB leads 9 to 7.
Is CRS or HUBB cheaper?: On trailing earnings, HUBB is cheaper: CRS trades at a 59.11 P/E and HUBB at 29.69.
Which has grown faster, CRS or HUBB?: Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus HUBB at 8.15%.
Does CRS or HUBB pay a bigger dividend?: CRS yields 0.14% and HUBB yields 1.11% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CRS or HUBB more profitable?: CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus HUBB at 15.10%.
Which has been the better investment, CRS or HUBB?: Over the past 10-year, CRS delivered the higher annualized total return — CRS at 34.71% versus HUBB at 19.78%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CRS analysis Full HUBB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Carpenter Technology P/E ratio Hubbell P/E ratio Carpenter Technology dividend yield Hubbell dividend yield Carpenter Technology ROE Hubbell ROE Carpenter Technology operating margin Hubbell operating margin Carpenter Technology revenue growth Hubbell revenue growth Carpenter Technology free cash flow Hubbell free cash flow

Carpenter Technology & Hubbell appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.