Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW)
CRS leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics, though CW is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$561.59Industrials
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
$762.59Industrials
Total return — CRS vs CW
growth of $100 · last 30yCRS +3303.6%CW +11646.2%CW compounded faster
CRS CW
CRS vs CW: by the numbers
- •CW is the larger company ($28.49B vs $27.90B market cap).
- •CW trades at the lower earnings multiple (55.83 vs 59.11 P/E).
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (15.82% vs 14.17% net margin).
- •CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.23% vs 8.60% CAGR).
- •CRS pays the higher dividend yield (0.14% vs 0.13%).
Which is better, CRS or CW?
Metric tally: CRS 10 · CW 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCW(lower P/E)
GrowthCRS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCRS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | CW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 59.11 | 55.83● |
| Forward P/E | 44.62 | 44.68 |
| P/S ratio | 9.33 | 7.84● |
| P/B ratio | 13.66 | 10.74● |
| PEG ratio | 0.37● | 1.94 |
| EV / EBITDA | 36.68 | 35.53● |
| FCF yield | 1.44% | 2.09%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.73% | 37.17%● |
| Operating margin | 21.34%● | 18.48% |
| Net margin | 15.82%● | 14.17% |
| ROE | 23.17%● | 19.42% |
| ROIC | 13.94%● | 12.41% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14%● | 0.13% |
| Payout ratio | 10.68% | 7.57% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.23%● | 8.60% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 218.42%● | 21.79% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.57%● | 8.67% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 69.74%● | 44.20% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRS or CW?
- It depends on your goal. value: CW (lower P/E); growth: CRS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CRS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CRS leads 10 to 6.
- Is CRS or CW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CW is cheaper: CRS trades at a 59.11 P/E and CW at 55.83.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or CW?
- Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus CW at 8.60%.
- Does CRS or CW pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS yields 0.14% and CW yields 0.13% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRS or CW more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus CW at 14.17%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRS or CW?
- Over the past 10-year, CRS delivered the higher annualized total return — CRS at 34.71% versus CW at 25.29%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioCurtiss-Wright P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldCurtiss-Wright dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROECurtiss-Wright ROECarpenter Technology operating marginCurtiss-Wright operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthCurtiss-Wright revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowCurtiss-Wright free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & Curtiss-Wright appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.