Which has grown faster, CRI or MSC?

Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — CRI at a -0.85% CAGR versus MSC at 69.81%.

Does CRI or MSC pay a bigger dividend?

CRI pays a dividend (2.49% yield) while MSC does not currently pay one.

Is CRI or MSC more profitable?

CRI runs the higher net margin — CRI at 3.07% versus MSC at -5.63%.

Which has been the better investment, CRI or MSC?

Over the past 5-year, CRI delivered the higher annualized total return — CRI at -6.95% versus MSC at -30.17%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Carter's Inc. (CRI) vs Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC)

MSC leads on 7 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Carter's Inc. and Studio City International Holdings Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 11, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CRI

Carter's Inc.

$1.48B

$40.19Consumer Cyclical

MSC

Studio City International Holdings Limited

$87M

$1.76Consumer Cyclical

Total return — CRI vs MSC

growth of $100 · last 8y

CRI -58.1%MSC -88.6%CRI compounded faster

CRI MSC

CRI vs MSC: by the numbers

•CRI is the larger company ($1.48B vs $87M market cap).
•CRI is profitable (3.07% net margin) while MSC runs a net loss (-5.63%).
•MSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (69.81% vs -0.85% CAGR).
•CRI pays a dividend (2.49% yield) while MSC does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CRI or MSC?

Metric tally: CRI 4 · MSC 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMSC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCRI(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CRI	MSC
P/E ratio	15.85	—
Forward P/E	12.14	—
P/S ratio	0.48	0.12●
P/B ratio	1.53	0.17●
PEG ratio	25.15	—
EV / EBITDA	10.88	6.89●
FCF yield	8.92%	—

Profitability

Metric	CRI	MSC
Gross margin	44.66%	68.05%●
Operating margin	4.80%	11.60%●
Net margin	3.07%●	-5.63%
ROE	9.76%●	-7.94%
ROIC	5.29%●	2.68%

Dividends

Metric	CRI	MSC
Dividend yield	2.49%	—
Payout ratio	38.61%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CRI	MSC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-0.85%	69.81%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.63%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-24.78%	-20.72%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-14.06%●	-30.17%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CRI or MSC?: It depends on your goal. growth: MSC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CRI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MSC leads 7 to 4.
Which has grown faster, CRI or MSC?: Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — CRI at a -0.85% CAGR versus MSC at 69.81%.
Does CRI or MSC pay a bigger dividend?: CRI pays a dividend (2.49% yield) while MSC does not currently pay one.
Is CRI or MSC more profitable?: CRI runs the higher net margin — CRI at 3.07% versus MSC at -5.63%.
Which has been the better investment, CRI or MSC?: Over the past 5-year, CRI delivered the higher annualized total return — CRI at -6.95% versus MSC at -30.17%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CRI analysis Full MSC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Carter's P/E ratio Studio City International P/E ratio Carter's dividend yield Studio City International dividend yield Carter's ROE Studio City International ROE Carter's operating margin Studio City International operating margin Carter's revenue growth Studio City International revenue growth Carter's free cash flow Studio City International free cash flow

Carter's & Studio City International appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 11, 2026.