Is CRI or EPAC cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CRI is cheaper: CRI trades at a 16.87 P/E and EPAC at 21.91.

Which has grown faster, CRI or EPAC?

Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — CRI at a -1.35% CAGR versus EPAC at 6.64%.

Does CRI or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?

CRI yields 2.34% and EPAC yields 0.11% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CRI or EPAC more profitable?

EPAC runs the higher net margin — CRI at 3.07% versus EPAC at 13.69%.

Which has been the better investment, CRI or EPAC?

Over the past 10-year, EPAC delivered the higher annualized total return — CRI at -5.94% versus EPAC at 3.09%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Carter's, Inc. (CRI) vs Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)

EPAC leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics, though CRI is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Carter's, Inc. and Enerpac Tool Group Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CRI

Carter's, Inc.

$1.58B

$42.79Consumer Cyclical

EPAC

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

$1.85B

$35.05Industrials

Total return — CRI vs EPAC

growth of $100 · last 23y

CRI +237.5%EPAC +131.4%CRI compounded faster

CRI EPAC

CRI vs EPAC: by the numbers

•EPAC is the larger company ($1.85B vs $1.58B market cap).
•CRI trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.87 vs 21.91 P/E).
•EPAC converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 3.07% net margin).
•EPAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.64% vs -1.35% CAGR).
•CRI pays the higher dividend yield (2.34% vs 0.11%).

Which is better, CRI or EPAC?

Metric tally: CRI 7 · EPAC 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCRI(lower P/E)

GrowthEPAC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeCRI(higher dividend yield)

QualityEPAC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CRI	EPAC
P/E ratio	16.87●	21.91
Forward P/E	12.92●	18.50
P/S ratio	0.51●	2.96
P/B ratio	1.63●	4.54
PEG ratio	26.78	2.78●
EV / EBITDA	10.86●	13.91
FCF yield	8.38%●	5.98%

Profitability

Metric	CRI	EPAC
Gross margin	44.66%	48.58%●
Operating margin	4.80%	20.52%●
Net margin	3.07%	13.69%●
ROE	9.76%	21.00%●
ROIC	5.29%	15.12%●

Dividends

Metric	CRI	EPAC
Dividend yield	2.34%●	0.11%
Payout ratio	38.61%	2.33%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CRI	EPAC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.35%	6.64%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.63%	169.53%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-24.78%	31.53%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-13.48%	6.02%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CRI or EPAC?: It depends on your goal. value: CRI (lower P/E); growth: EPAC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CRI (higher dividend yield); quality: EPAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EPAC leads 10 to 7.
Is CRI or EPAC cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CRI is cheaper: CRI trades at a 16.87 P/E and EPAC at 21.91.
Which has grown faster, CRI or EPAC?: Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — CRI at a -1.35% CAGR versus EPAC at 6.64%.
Does CRI or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?: CRI yields 2.34% and EPAC yields 0.11% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CRI or EPAC more profitable?: EPAC runs the higher net margin — CRI at 3.07% versus EPAC at 13.69%.
Which has been the better investment, CRI or EPAC?: Over the past 10-year, EPAC delivered the higher annualized total return — CRI at -5.94% versus EPAC at 3.09%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CRI analysis Full EPAC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Carter's P/E ratio Enerpac Tool P/E ratio Carter's dividend yield Enerpac Tool dividend yield Carter's ROE Enerpac Tool ROE Carter's operating margin Enerpac Tool operating margin Carter's revenue growth Enerpac Tool revenue growth Carter's free cash flow Enerpac Tool free cash flow

Carter's & Enerpac Tool appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.