Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) vs GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS)
CRDO leads on 7 of 12 compared metrics, though GFS is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
$238.00Technology
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
$79.78Technology
Total return — CRDO vs GFS
growth of $100 · last 4yCRDO +1942.9%GFS +78.4%CRDO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRDO GFS
CRDO vs GFS: by the numbers
- •CRDO is the larger company ($44.38B vs $43.78B market cap).
- •GFS trades at the lower earnings multiple (57.40 vs 95.97 P/E).
- •CRDO converts more revenue to profit (35.37% vs 11.37% net margin).
- •CRDO grew revenue faster over the past five years (86.69% vs 6.81% CAGR).
- •GFS pays a dividend (0.15% yield) while CRDO does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CRDO or GFS?
Metric tally: CRDO 7 · GFS 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGFS(lower P/E)
GrowthCRDO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCRDO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRDO | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 95.97 | 57.40● |
| Forward P/E | 26.85● | 42.15 |
| P/S ratio | 34.35 | 6.54● |
| P/B ratio | 22.22 | 3.83● |
| PEG ratio | 0.09 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 93.15 | 21.13● |
| FCF yield | 0.89% | 2.40%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CRDO | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 68.04%● | 26.40% |
| Operating margin | 33.33%● | 12.08% |
| Net margin | 35.37%● | 11.37% |
| ROE | 22.89%● | 6.65% |
| ROIC | 21.06%● | 5.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRDO | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.15% |
| Payout ratio | — | 7.55% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRDO | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 86.69%● | 6.81% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 129.03% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | 45.78% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRDO or GFS?
- It depends on your goal. value: GFS (lower P/E); growth: CRDO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CRDO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CRDO leads 7 to 5.
- Is CRDO or GFS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GFS is cheaper: CRDO trades at a 95.97 P/E and GFS at 57.40.
- Which has grown faster, CRDO or GFS?
- Over the past five years, CRDO grew revenue faster — CRDO at a 86.69% CAGR versus GFS at 6.81%.
- Does CRDO or GFS pay a bigger dividend?
- GFS pays a dividend (0.15% yield) while CRDO does not currently pay one.
- Is CRDO or GFS more profitable?
- CRDO runs the higher net margin — CRDO at 35.37% versus GFS at 11.37%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Credo Technology Group P/E ratioGLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratioCredo Technology Group dividend yieldGLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yieldCredo Technology Group ROEGLOBALFOUNDRIES ROECredo Technology Group operating marginGLOBALFOUNDRIES operating marginCredo Technology Group revenue growthGLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growthCredo Technology Group free cash flowGLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow
Credo Technology Group & GLOBALFOUNDRIES appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.