Which has grown faster, CRC or EQT?

Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — CRC at a 15.91% CAGR versus EQT at 26.65%.

Does CRC or EQT pay a bigger dividend?

CRC yields 2.73% and EQT yields 1.26% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CRC or EQT more profitable?

EQT runs the higher net margin — CRC at -13.09% versus EQT at 33.40%.

Which has been the better investment, CRC or EQT?

Over the past 10-year, CRC delivered the higher annualized total return — CRC at 16.69% versus EQT at 3.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

California Resources Corporation (CRC) vs EQT Corporation (EQT)

EQT leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of California Resources Corporation and EQT Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CRC

California Resources Corporation

Total return — CRC vs EQT

growth of $100 · last 12y

CRC -27.6%EQT +1.2%EQT compounded faster

CRC EQT

CRC vs EQT: by the numbers

•EQT is the larger company ($32.49B vs $5.20B market cap).
•EQT is profitable (33.40% net margin) while CRC runs a net loss (-13.09%).
•EQT grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.65% vs 15.91% CAGR).
•CRC pays the higher dividend yield (2.73% vs 1.26%).

Which is better, CRC or EQT?

Metric tally: CRC 3 · EQT 12

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthEQT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeCRC(higher dividend yield)

QualityCRC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CRC	EQT
P/E ratio	—	9.62
Forward P/E	13.17	11.09●
P/S ratio	1.47●	3.24
P/B ratio	1.78	1.29●
PEG ratio	—	0.03
EV / EBITDA	20.88	4.97●
FCF yield	7.50%	12.50%●

Profitability

Metric	CRC	EQT
Gross margin	37.83%	64.05%●
Operating margin	20.70%	46.73%●
Net margin	-13.09%	33.40%●
ROE	-15.87%	13.34%●
ROIC	9.67%●	6.18%

Dividends

Metric	CRC	EQT
Dividend yield	2.73%●	1.26%
Payout ratio	38.43%	19.59%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CRC	EQT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.91%	26.65%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-28.68%	-10.45%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	43.34%	58.98%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.72%	19.27%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CRC or EQT?: It depends on your goal. growth: EQT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CRC (higher dividend yield); quality: CRC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EQT leads 12 to 3.
Which has grown faster, CRC or EQT?: Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — CRC at a 15.91% CAGR versus EQT at 26.65%.
Does CRC or EQT pay a bigger dividend?: CRC yields 2.73% and EQT yields 1.26% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CRC or EQT more profitable?: EQT runs the higher net margin — CRC at -13.09% versus EQT at 33.40%.
Which has been the better investment, CRC or EQT?: Over the past 10-year, CRC delivered the higher annualized total return — CRC at 16.69% versus EQT at 3.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CRC analysis Full EQT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

California Resources P/E ratio EQT P/E ratio California Resources dividend yield EQT dividend yield California Resources ROE EQT ROE California Resources operating margin EQT operating margin California Resources revenue growth EQT revenue growth California Resources free cash flow EQT free cash flow

California Resources & EQT appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.