Is CPRT or STRL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CPRT is cheaper: CPRT trades at a 18.39 P/E and STRL at 79.81.

Which has grown faster, CPRT or STRL?

Over the past five years, STRL grew revenue faster — CPRT at a 13.44% CAGR versus STRL at 14.81%.

Is CPRT or STRL more profitable?

CPRT runs the higher net margin — CPRT at 33.48% versus STRL at 12.02%.

Which has been the better investment, CPRT or STRL?

Over the past 10-year, STRL delivered the higher annualized total return — CPRT at 16.96% versus STRL at 67.55%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Copart, Inc. (CPRT) vs Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL)

CPRT leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Copart, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.

$27.38B

$892.25Industrials

Total return — CPRT vs STRL

growth of $100 · last 30y

CPRT +17386.9%STRL +71280.0%STRL compounded faster

CPRT STRL

CPRT vs STRL: by the numbers

•CPRT is the larger company ($27.40B vs $27.38B market cap).
•CPRT trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.39 vs 79.81 P/E).
•CPRT converts more revenue to profit (33.48% vs 12.02% net margin).
•STRL grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.81% vs 13.44% CAGR).

Which is better, CPRT or STRL?

Metric tally: CPRT 10 · STRL 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCPRT(lower P/E)

GrowthSTRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualitySTRL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CPRT	STRL
P/E ratio	18.39●	79.81
Forward P/E	18.68●	37.10
P/S ratio	6.16●	9.60
P/B ratio	3.26●	23.28
PEG ratio	2.10●	2.34
EV / EBITDA	11.92●	46.65
FCF yield	4.69%●	1.59%

Profitability

Metric	CPRT	STRL
Gross margin	45.53%●	23.29%
Operating margin	36.57%●	17.25%
Net margin	33.48%●	12.02%
ROE	17.70%	29.14%●
ROIC	14.70%	19.06%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CPRT	STRL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.44%	14.81%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.51%	44.28%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.15%	31.85%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-2.10%	109.90%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CPRT or STRL?: It depends on your goal. value: CPRT (lower P/E); growth: STRL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: STRL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CPRT leads 10 to 6.
Is CPRT or STRL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CPRT is cheaper: CPRT trades at a 18.39 P/E and STRL at 79.81.
Which has grown faster, CPRT or STRL?: Over the past five years, STRL grew revenue faster — CPRT at a 13.44% CAGR versus STRL at 14.81%.
Is CPRT or STRL more profitable?: CPRT runs the higher net margin — CPRT at 33.48% versus STRL at 12.02%.
Which has been the better investment, CPRT or STRL?: Over the past 10-year, STRL delivered the higher annualized total return — CPRT at 16.96% versus STRL at 67.55%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CPRT analysis Full STRL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Copart P/E ratio Sterling Infrastructure P/E ratio Copart dividend yield Sterling Infrastructure dividend yield Copart ROE Sterling Infrastructure ROE Copart operating margin Sterling Infrastructure operating margin Copart revenue growth Sterling Infrastructure revenue growth Copart free cash flow Sterling Infrastructure free cash flow

Copart & Sterling Infrastructure appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.