Copart, Inc. (CPRT) vs Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS)
CPRT leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Copart, Inc. and Carpenter Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CPRT
Copart, Inc.
$30.30Industrials
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$561.59Industrials
Total return — CPRT vs CRS
growth of $100 · last 30yCPRT +17149.3%CRS +3303.6%CPRT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CPRT CRS
CPRT vs CRS: by the numbers
- •CPRT is the larger company ($28.28B vs $27.90B market cap).
- •CPRT trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.82 vs 59.11 P/E).
- •CPRT converts more revenue to profit (33.48% vs 15.82% net margin).
- •CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.23% vs 13.44% CAGR).
- •CRS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while CPRT does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CPRT or CRS?
Metric tally: CPRT 11 · CRS 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCPRT(lower P/E)
GrowthCRS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCPRT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CPRT | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.82● | 59.11 |
| Forward P/E | 19.12● | 44.62 |
| P/S ratio | 6.30● | 9.33 |
| P/B ratio | 3.33● | 13.66 |
| PEG ratio | 2.11 | 0.37● |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.23● | 36.68 |
| FCF yield | 4.58%● | 1.44% |
Profitability
| Metric | CPRT | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 45.53%● | 29.73% |
| Operating margin | 36.57%● | 21.34% |
| Net margin | 33.48%● | 15.82% |
| ROE | 17.70% | 23.17%● |
| ROIC | 14.70%● | 13.94% |
Dividends
| Metric | CPRT | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.14% |
| Payout ratio | — | 10.68% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CPRT | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 13.44% | 15.23%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.51% | 218.42%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.15%● | 14.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.56% | 69.74%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CPRT or CRS?
- It depends on your goal. value: CPRT (lower P/E); growth: CRS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CPRT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CPRT leads 11 to 5.
- Is CPRT or CRS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CPRT is cheaper: CPRT trades at a 18.82 P/E and CRS at 59.11.
- Which has grown faster, CPRT or CRS?
- Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CPRT at a 13.44% CAGR versus CRS at 15.23%.
- Does CPRT or CRS pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while CPRT does not currently pay one.
- Is CPRT or CRS more profitable?
- CPRT runs the higher net margin — CPRT at 33.48% versus CRS at 15.82%.
- Which has been the better investment, CPRT or CRS?
- Over the past 10-year, CRS delivered the higher annualized total return — CPRT at 17.46% versus CRS at 34.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Copart P/E ratioCarpenter Technology P/E ratioCopart dividend yieldCarpenter Technology dividend yieldCopart ROECarpenter Technology ROECopart operating marginCarpenter Technology operating marginCopart revenue growthCarpenter Technology revenue growthCopart free cash flowCarpenter Technology free cash flow
Copart & Carpenter Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.