Which has the lower trailing P/E, CP or WM?

CP has the lower trailing P/E: CP trades at 28.86 and WM at 31.74. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CP or WM?

Over the past five years, CP grew revenue faster — CP at a 20.89% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.

Does CP or WM pay a bigger dividend?

CP yields 0.71% and WM yields 1.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CP or WM more profitable?

CP runs the higher net margin — CP at 18.86% versus WM at 11.12%.

How have CP and WM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CP delivered 13.23% and WM delivered 15.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. (CP) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)

A side-by-side comparison of Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.

$85.00B

$96.69IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Waste Management, Inc.

$89.56B

$224.06IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — CP vs WM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CP +246.6% (+13.2%/yr)WM +319.4% (+15.4%/yr)WM compounded faster over this window

CP WM

CP vs WM: by the numbers

•WM is the larger company ($89.56B vs $85.00B market cap).
•CP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (28.86 vs 31.74 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CP converts more revenue to profit (18.86% vs 11.12% net margin).
•CP grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.89% vs 9.22% CAGR).
•WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.58% vs 0.71%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CP	WM
P/E ratio	28.86	31.74
Forward P/E	18.12	27.62
P/S ratio	5.37	3.52
P/B ratio	2.61	9.10
EV / EBITDA	17.17	14.57
FCF yield	2.00%	3.95%

Profitability

Metric	CP	WM
Gross margin	59.84%	35.04%
Operating margin	37.20%	18.54%
Net margin	18.86%	11.12%
ROE	9.18%	28.74%
ROIC	5.40%	9.01%

Dividends

Metric	CP	WM
Dividend yield	0.71%	1.58%
Payout ratio	20.75%	52.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CP	WM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	20.89%	9.22%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	3.04%	13.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	12.22%	7.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.34%	9.62%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CP or WM?: CP has the lower trailing P/E: CP trades at 28.86 and WM at 31.74. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CP or WM?: Over the past five years, CP grew revenue faster — CP at a 20.89% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.
Does CP or WM pay a bigger dividend?: CP yields 0.71% and WM yields 1.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CP or WM more profitable?: CP runs the higher net margin — CP at 18.86% versus WM at 11.12%.
How have CP and WM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CP delivered 13.23% and WM delivered 15.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CP analysis Full WM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Canadian Pacific Kansas City P/E ratio Waste Management P/E ratio Canadian Pacific Kansas City dividend yield Waste Management dividend yield Canadian Pacific Kansas City ROE Waste Management ROE Canadian Pacific Kansas City operating margin Waste Management operating margin Canadian Pacific Kansas City revenue growth Waste Management revenue growth Canadian Pacific Kansas City free cash flow Waste Management free cash flow

Canadian Pacific Kansas City & Waste Management appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.