On trailing earnings, CP is cheaper: CP trades at a 25.41 P/E and WM at 33.86.

Which has grown faster, CP or WM?

Over the past five years, CP grew revenue faster — CP at a 15.26% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.

Does CP or WM pay a bigger dividend?

CP yields 0.85% and WM yields 1.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CP or WM more profitable?

CP runs the higher net margin — CP at 26.86% versus WM at 10.99%.

Which has been the better investment, CP or WM?

Over the past 10-year, WM delivered the higher annualized total return — CP at 13.87% versus WM at 15.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. (CP) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)

CP leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.

$80.19B

$90.33Industrials

Waste Management, Inc.

$93.03B

$231.67Industrials

Total return — CP vs WM

growth of $100 · last 30y

CP +3963.6%WM +731.6%CP compounded faster

CP WM

CP vs WM: by the numbers

•WM is the larger company ($93.03B vs $80.19B market cap).
•CP trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.41 vs 33.86 P/E).
•CP converts more revenue to profit (26.86% vs 10.99% net margin).
•CP grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.26% vs 10.25% CAGR).
•WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.62% vs 0.85%).

Which is better, CP or WM?

Metric tally: CP 9 · WM 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCP(lower P/E)

GrowthCP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeWM(higher dividend yield)

QualityWM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CP	WM
P/E ratio	25.41●	33.86
Forward P/E	17.38●	28.59
P/S ratio	6.73	3.72●
P/B ratio	2.40●	9.44
PEG ratio	1.65●	2.47
EV / EBITDA	16.25	15.30●
FCF yield	1.85%	3.48%●

Profitability

Metric	CP	WM
Gross margin	46.67%●	32.06%
Operating margin	36.78%●	18.46%
Net margin	26.86%●	10.99%
ROE	9.56%	27.88%●
ROIC	5.09%	8.88%●

Dividends

Metric	CP	WM
Dividend yield	0.85%	1.62%●
Payout ratio	22.96%	56.25%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CP	WM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.26%●	10.25%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	3.04%	13.68%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.84%●	7.28%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.99%	12.21%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CP or WM?: It depends on your goal. value: CP (lower P/E); growth: CP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WM (higher dividend yield); quality: WM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CP leads 9 to 8.
Is CP or WM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CP is cheaper: CP trades at a 25.41 P/E and WM at 33.86.
Which has grown faster, CP or WM?: Over the past five years, CP grew revenue faster — CP at a 15.26% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.
Does CP or WM pay a bigger dividend?: CP yields 0.85% and WM yields 1.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CP or WM more profitable?: CP runs the higher net margin — CP at 26.86% versus WM at 10.99%.
Which has been the better investment, CP or WM?: Over the past 10-year, WM delivered the higher annualized total return — CP at 13.87% versus WM at 15.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CP analysis Full WM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Canadian Pacific Kansas City P/E ratio Waste Management P/E ratio Canadian Pacific Kansas City dividend yield Waste Management dividend yield Canadian Pacific Kansas City ROE Waste Management ROE Canadian Pacific Kansas City operating margin Waste Management operating margin Canadian Pacific Kansas City revenue growth Waste Management revenue growth Canadian Pacific Kansas City free cash flow Waste Management free cash flow

Canadian Pacific Kansas City & Waste Management appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.