Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. (CP) vs 3M Company (MMM)
CP leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. and 3M Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CP vs MMM
growth of $100 · last 30yCP +3874.4%MMM +476.0%CP compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CP MMM
CP vs MMM: by the numbers
- •MMM is the larger company ($87.61B vs $77.27B market cap).
- •CP trades at the lower earnings multiple (24.74 vs 32.36 P/E).
- •CP converts more revenue to profit (26.86% vs 11.14% net margin).
- •CP grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.26% vs -5.36% CAGR).
- •MMM pays the higher dividend yield (1.80% vs 0.98%).
Which is better, CP or MMM?
Metric tally: CP 10 · MMM 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCP(lower P/E)
GrowthCP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMMM(higher dividend yield)
QualityMMM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CP | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.74● | 32.36 |
| Forward P/E | 14.70● | 17.68 |
| P/S ratio | 6.56 | 3.58● |
| P/B ratio | 2.33● | 27.43 |
| PEG ratio | 1.65 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.53● | 17.02 |
| FCF yield | 1.90% | 2.30%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CP | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 46.67%● | 39.51% |
| Operating margin | 36.78%● | 19.60% |
| Net margin | 26.86%● | 11.14% |
| ROE | 9.56% | 85.41%● |
| ROIC | 5.09% | 11.53%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CP | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 1.80%● |
| Payout ratio | 25.83% | 50.00% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CP | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.26%● | -5.36% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 3.04%● | -8.53% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.84%● | -21.95% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.19% | 4.29%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CP or MMM?
- It depends on your goal. value: CP (lower P/E); growth: CP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MMM (higher dividend yield); quality: MMM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CP leads 10 to 6.
- Is CP or MMM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CP is cheaper: CP trades at a 24.74 P/E and MMM at 32.36.
- Which has grown faster, CP or MMM?
- Over the past five years, CP grew revenue faster — CP at a 15.26% CAGR versus MMM at -5.36%.
- Does CP or MMM pay a bigger dividend?
- CP yields 0.98% and MMM yields 1.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CP or MMM more profitable?
- CP runs the higher net margin — CP at 26.86% versus MMM at 11.14%.
- Which has been the better investment, CP or MMM?
- Over the past 10-year, CP delivered the higher annualized total return — CP at 14.38% versus MMM at 5.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Canadian Pacific Kansas City P/E ratio3M P/E ratioCanadian Pacific Kansas City dividend yield3M dividend yieldCanadian Pacific Kansas City ROE3M ROECanadian Pacific Kansas City operating margin3M operating marginCanadian Pacific Kansas City revenue growth3M revenue growthCanadian Pacific Kansas City free cash flow3M free cash flow
Canadian Pacific Kansas City & 3M appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.