Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO)

TRNO leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Terreno Realty Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — COST vs TRNO

growth of $100 · last 16y
COST +1571.8%TRNO +260.7%COST compounded faster
05001k2kStart $10020132016201920222025$1,672$361
COST TRNO

COST vs TRNO: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($435.65B vs $7.15B market cap).
  • TRNO trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.49 vs 49.41 P/E).
  • TRNO converts more revenue to profit (86.52% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • TRNO grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.57% vs 9.48% CAGR).
  • TRNO pays the higher dividend yield (3.05% vs 0.55%).

Which is better, COST or TRNO?

Metric tally: COST 4 · TRNO 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTRNO(lower P/E)
GrowthTRNO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRNO(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOST(higher ROIC)

Valuation

MetricCOSTTRNO
P/E ratio49.4116.49
Forward P/E43.4040.04
P/S ratio1.4914.43
P/B ratio13.031.65
PEG ratio5.230.14
EV / EBITDA29.4313.82
FCF yield2.02%

Profitability

MetricCOSTTRNO
Gross margin12.88%63.89%
Operating margin3.82%40.81%
Net margin3.01%86.52%
ROE26.38%9.88%
ROIC19.44%3.66%

Dividends

MetricCOSTTRNO
Dividend yield0.55%3.05%
Payout ratio29.44%52.16%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTTRNO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%20.57%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%35.52%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%
Total return CAGR (5Y)21.56%3.07%

Frequently asked

Which is better, COST or TRNO?
It depends on your goal. value: TRNO (lower P/E); growth: TRNO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRNO (higher dividend yield); quality: COST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRNO leads 11 to 4.
Is COST or TRNO cheaper?
On trailing earnings, TRNO is cheaper: COST trades at a 49.41 P/E and TRNO at 16.49.
Which has grown faster, COST or TRNO?
Over the past five years, TRNO grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus TRNO at 20.57%.
Does COST or TRNO pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.55% and TRNO yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or TRNO more profitable?
TRNO runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus TRNO at 86.52%.
Which has been the better investment, COST or TRNO?
Over the past 10-year, COST delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 21.26% versus TRNO at 13.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.