Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Tencent Holdings Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; TCEHY is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCOST vs TCEHY

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
COST +537.6% (+20.4%/yr)TCEHY +121.6% (+8.3%/yr)COST compounded faster over this window
200400600Start $10020182020202220242026$638$222
COST TCEHY

COST vs TCEHY: by the numbers

  • TCEHY is the larger company ($491.57B vs $401.25B market cap).
  • TCEHY trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.97 vs 45.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • TCEHY converts more revenue to profit (29.83% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 6.83% CAGR).
  • TCEHY pays the higher dividend yield (1.23% vs 0.61%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTTCEHY
P/E ratio45.5114.97
Forward P/E39.92N/A
P/S ratio1.374.36
P/B ratio11.972.94
EV / EBITDA28.3211.31
FCF yield2.19%5.21%

Profitability

MetricCOSTTCEHY
Gross margin12.88%55.66%
Operating margin3.82%32.48%
Net margin3.01%29.83%
ROE26.38%20.11%
ROIC19.01%11.92%

Dividends

MetricCOSTTCEHY
Dividend yield0.61%1.23%
Payout ratio27.87%18.51%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTTCEHY
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%6.83%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%5.91%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%2.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.89%-0.93%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or TCEHY?
TCEHY has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.51 and TCEHY at 14.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or TCEHY?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus TCEHY at 6.83%.
Does COST or TCEHY pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.61% and TCEHY yields 1.23% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or TCEHY more profitable?
TCEHY runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus TCEHY at 29.83%.
How have COST and TCEHY total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.56% and TCEHY delivered 8.51% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.