Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY)
TCEHY leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Tencent Holdings Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
$982.35Consumer Defensive
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
$59.06Communication Services
Total return — COST vs TCEHY
growth of $100 · last 18yCOST +1737.2%TCEHY +4001.4%TCEHY compounded faster
COST TCEHY
COST vs TCEHY: by the numbers
- •TCEHY is the larger company ($533.13B vs $435.65B market cap).
- •TCEHY trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.48 vs 49.41 P/E).
- •TCEHY converts more revenue to profit (30.60% vs 3.01% net margin).
- •COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 7.40% CAGR).
- •TCEHY pays the higher dividend yield (1.14% vs 0.55%).
Which is better, COST or TCEHY?
Metric tally: COST 7 · TCEHY 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTCEHY(lower P/E)
GrowthCOST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTCEHY(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | COST | TCEHY |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 49.41 | 16.48● |
| Forward P/E | 43.40 | — |
| P/S ratio | 1.49● | 5.00 |
| P/B ratio | 13.03 | 3.33● |
| PEG ratio | 5.23 | 1.50● |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.43 | 12.31● |
| FCF yield | 2.02% | 4.78%● |
Profitability
| Metric | COST | TCEHY |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 12.88% | 55.36%● |
| Operating margin | 3.82% | 32.33%● |
| Net margin | 3.01% | 30.60%● |
| ROE | 26.38%● | 20.37% |
| ROIC | 19.44%● | 11.71% |
Dividends
| Metric | COST | TCEHY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 1.14%● |
| Payout ratio | 29.44% | 19.63% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COST | TCEHY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.48%● | 7.40% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.04%● | 5.91% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.95%● | 2.70% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.56%● | -3.77% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, COST or TCEHY?
- It depends on your goal. value: TCEHY (lower P/E); growth: COST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TCEHY (higher dividend yield); quality: COST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TCEHY leads 9 to 7.
- Is COST or TCEHY cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TCEHY is cheaper: COST trades at a 49.41 P/E and TCEHY at 16.48.
- Which has grown faster, COST or TCEHY?
- Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus TCEHY at 7.40%.
- Does COST or TCEHY pay a bigger dividend?
- COST yields 0.55% and TCEHY yields 1.14% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COST or TCEHY more profitable?
- TCEHY runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus TCEHY at 30.60%.
- Which has been the better investment, COST or TCEHY?
- Over the past 10-year, COST delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 21.26% versus TCEHY at 11.18%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Costco Wholesale P/E ratioTencent P/E ratioCostco Wholesale dividend yieldTencent dividend yieldCostco Wholesale ROETencent ROECostco Wholesale operating marginTencent operating marginCostco Wholesale revenue growthTencent revenue growthCostco Wholesale free cash flowTencent free cash flow
Costco Wholesale & Tencent appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.