Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)
MU leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
$982.35Consumer Defensive
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$981.61Technology
Total return — COST vs MU
growth of $100 · last 30yCOST +9597.4%MU +6496.8%COST compounded faster
COST MU
COST vs MU: by the numbers
- •MU is the larger company ($1.11T vs $435.65B market cap).
- •MU trades at the lower earnings multiple (46.32 vs 49.41 P/E).
- •MU converts more revenue to profit (41.49% vs 3.01% net margin).
- •MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.34% vs 9.48% CAGR).
- •COST pays the higher dividend yield (0.55% vs 0.05%).
Which is better, COST or MU?
Metric tally: COST 7 · MU 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMU(lower P/E)
GrowthMU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCOST(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | COST | MU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 49.41 | 46.32● |
| Forward P/E | 43.40 | — |
| P/S ratio | 1.49● | 19.25 |
| P/B ratio | 13.03● | 15.44 |
| PEG ratio | 5.23 | 0.02● |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.43● | 30.08 |
| FCF yield | 2.02%● | 0.92% |
Profitability
| Metric | COST | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 12.88% | 58.44%● |
| Operating margin | 3.82% | 48.52%● |
| Net margin | 3.01% | 41.49%● |
| ROE | 26.38% | 33.28%● |
| ROIC | 19.44%● | 12.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | COST | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.55%● | 0.05% |
| Payout ratio | 29.44% | 6.47% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COST | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.48% | 20.34%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.04%● | 5.12% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.95% | 140.90%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.56% | 66.18%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, COST or MU?
- It depends on your goal. value: MU (lower P/E); growth: MU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: COST (higher dividend yield); quality: COST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MU leads 9 to 7.
- Is COST or MU cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MU is cheaper: COST trades at a 49.41 P/E and MU at 46.32.
- Which has grown faster, COST or MU?
- Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus MU at 20.34%.
- Does COST or MU pay a bigger dividend?
- COST yields 0.55% and MU yields 0.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COST or MU more profitable?
- MU runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus MU at 41.49%.
- Which has been the better investment, COST or MU?
- Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 21.26% versus MU at 55.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Costco Wholesale P/E ratioMicron Technology P/E ratioCostco Wholesale dividend yieldMicron Technology dividend yieldCostco Wholesale ROEMicron Technology ROECostco Wholesale operating marginMicron Technology operating marginCostco Wholesale revenue growthMicron Technology revenue growthCostco Wholesale free cash flowMicron Technology free cash flow
Costco Wholesale & Micron Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.