Which has the lower trailing P/E, COP or SLB?

COP has the lower trailing P/E: COP trades at 18.17 and SLB at 28.36. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, COP or SLB?

Over the past five years, COP grew revenue faster — COP at a 16.08% CAGR versus SLB at 10.93%.

Does COP or SLB pay a bigger dividend?

COP yields 2.45% and SLB yields 2.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is COP or SLB more profitable?

COP runs the higher net margin — COP at 14.87% versus SLB at 8.46%.

How have COP and SLB total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, COP delivered 16.47% and SLB delivered -0.20% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Slb N.V. (SLB)

A side-by-side comparison of ConocoPhillips and Slb N.V. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

COP

ConocoPhillips

$165.35B

$135.72EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SLB

Slb N.V.

$85.20B

$57.41EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — COP vs SLB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

COP +344.8% (+16.1%/yr)SLB -3.0% (-0.3%/yr)COP compounded faster over this window

COP SLB

COP vs SLB: by the numbers

•COP is the larger company ($165.35B vs $85.20B market cap).
•COP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.17 vs 28.36 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•COP converts more revenue to profit (14.87% vs 8.46% net margin).
•COP grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.08% vs 10.93% CAGR).
•COP pays the higher dividend yield (2.45% vs 2.01%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	COP	SLB
P/E ratio	18.17	28.36
Forward P/E	13.40	23.46
P/S ratio	2.67	2.42
P/B ratio	2.55	3.38
EV / EBITDA	7.04	12.84
FCF yield	11.76%	5.17%

Profitability

Metric	COP	SLB
Gross margin	24.63%	16.53%
Operating margin	22.68%	13.40%
Net margin	14.87%	8.46%
ROE	14.20%	11.80%
ROIC	8.01%	9.15%

Dividends

Metric	COP	SLB
Dividend yield	2.45%	2.01%
Payout ratio	52.83%	49.16%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	COP	SLB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	16.08%	10.93%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	35.98%	17.03%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	23.78%	17.82%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COP or SLB?: COP has the lower trailing P/E: COP trades at 18.17 and SLB at 28.36. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COP or SLB?: Over the past five years, COP grew revenue faster — COP at a 16.08% CAGR versus SLB at 10.93%.
Does COP or SLB pay a bigger dividend?: COP yields 2.45% and SLB yields 2.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COP or SLB more profitable?: COP runs the higher net margin — COP at 14.87% versus SLB at 8.46%.
How have COP and SLB total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, COP delivered 16.47% and SLB delivered -0.20% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full COP analysis Full SLB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

ConocoPhillips P/E ratio Slb P/E ratio ConocoPhillips dividend yield Slb dividend yield ConocoPhillips ROE Slb ROE ConocoPhillips operating margin Slb operating margin ConocoPhillips revenue growth Slb revenue growth ConocoPhillips free cash flow Slb free cash flow

ConocoPhillips & Slb appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 3, 2026.