ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI)
COP leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of ConocoPhillips and Kinder Morgan, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — COP vs KMI
growth of $100 · last 15yCOP +103.1%KMI +3.9%COP compounded faster
COP KMI
COP vs KMI: by the numbers
- •COP is the larger company ($133.65B vs $71.75B market cap).
- •COP trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.66 vs 21.64 P/E).
- •KMI converts more revenue to profit (18.92% vs 12.56% net margin).
- •COP grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.71% vs 4.10% CAGR).
- •KMI pays the higher dividend yield (3.64% vs 3.01%).
Which is better, COP or KMI?
Metric tally: COP 10 · KMI 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCOP(lower P/E)
GrowthCOP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKMI(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOP(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | COP | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.66● | 21.64 |
| Forward P/E | 12.16● | 21.49 |
| P/S ratio | 2.30● | 4.09 |
| P/B ratio | 2.08● | 2.29 |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.21● | 13.23 |
| FCF yield | 11.44%● | 5.42% |
Profitability
| Metric | COP | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.18% | 46.95%● |
| Operating margin | 18.28% | 28.61%● |
| Net margin | 12.56% | 18.92%● |
| ROE | 11.34%● | 10.58% |
| ROIC | 6.54%● | 5.33% |
Dividends
| Metric | COP | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.01% | 3.64%● |
| Payout ratio | 51.89% | 85.77% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COP | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 20.71%● | 4.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.18% | 96.49%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 97.59%● | -0.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.72% | 18.50%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, COP or KMI?
- It depends on your goal. value: COP (lower P/E); growth: COP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMI (higher dividend yield); quality: COP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, COP leads 10 to 6.
- Is COP or KMI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, COP is cheaper: COP trades at a 18.66 P/E and KMI at 21.64.
- Which has grown faster, COP or KMI?
- Over the past five years, COP grew revenue faster — COP at a 20.71% CAGR versus KMI at 4.10%.
- Does COP or KMI pay a bigger dividend?
- COP yields 3.01% and KMI yields 3.64% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COP or KMI more profitable?
- KMI runs the higher net margin — COP at 12.56% versus KMI at 18.92%.
- Which has been the better investment, COP or KMI?
- Over the past 10-year, COP delivered the higher annualized total return — COP at 13.06% versus KMI at 11.22%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
ConocoPhillips P/E ratioKinder Morgan P/E ratioConocoPhillips dividend yieldKinder Morgan dividend yieldConocoPhillips ROEKinder Morgan ROEConocoPhillips operating marginKinder Morgan operating marginConocoPhillips revenue growthKinder Morgan revenue growthConocoPhillips free cash flowKinder Morgan free cash flow
ConocoPhillips & Kinder Morgan appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 23, 2026.