Global X - MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) vs Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)

Over the past 10 years, EPAC lagged COLO — 3.09% vs 6.78% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

A side-by-side comparison of Global X - MSCI Colombia ETF and Enerpac Tool Group Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare

Total return — COLO vs EPAC

growth of $100 · last 17y
COLO +42.2%EPAC +108.5%EPAC compounded faster
100200300Start $10020122015201820212024$142$209
COLO EPAC

Metrics side by side

Did EPAC beat COLO?

Over the past 10 years, EPAC lagged COLO — 3.09% vs 6.78% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Total return (annualized)

MetricCOLOEPAC
Total return (1Y)61.51%-18.06%
Total return CAGR (3Y)35.29%8.31%
Total return CAGR (5Y)16.04%6.02%
Total return CAGR (10Y)6.78%3.09%

COLO is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).

Frequently asked

Has EPAC beaten COLO?
Over the past 10 years, EPAC lagged COLO — 3.09% vs 6.78% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.