Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) vs Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL)
CNQ leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Powell Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
$45.30Energy
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
$294.75Industrials
Total return — CNQ vs POWL
growth of $100 · last 26yCNQ +2533.7%POWL +10464.5%POWL compounded faster
CNQ POWL
CNQ vs POWL: by the numbers
- •CNQ is the larger company ($94.49B vs $10.74B market cap).
- •CNQ trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.41 vs 57.61 P/E).
- •CNQ converts more revenue to profit (23.94% vs 16.51% net margin).
- •POWL grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.84% vs 14.46% CAGR).
- •CNQ pays the higher dividend yield (2.89% vs 0.12%).
Which is better, CNQ or POWL?
Metric tally: CNQ 11 · POWL 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCNQ(lower P/E)
GrowthPOWL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCNQ(higher dividend yield)
QualityPOWL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CNQ | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.41● | 57.61 |
| Forward P/E | 9.16● | 44.88 |
| P/S ratio | 3.22● | 9.51 |
| P/B ratio | 4.12● | 15.19 |
| PEG ratio | 0.11● | 1.03 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.46● | 41.17 |
| FCF yield | 4.72%● | 1.79% |
Profitability
| Metric | CNQ | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.69% | 30.10% |
| Operating margin | 26.74%● | 19.76% |
| Net margin | 23.94%● | 16.51% |
| ROE | 30.65%● | 26.36% |
| ROIC | 7.95% | 25.41%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CNQ | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.89%● | 0.12% |
| Payout ratio | 34.74% | 7.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CNQ | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.46% | 19.84%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 13.65% | 59.98%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.93% | 34.56%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.57% | 99.30%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CNQ or POWL?
- It depends on your goal. value: CNQ (lower P/E); growth: POWL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CNQ (higher dividend yield); quality: POWL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CNQ leads 11 to 5.
- Is CNQ or POWL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CNQ is cheaper: CNQ trades at a 13.41 P/E and POWL at 57.61.
- Which has grown faster, CNQ or POWL?
- Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — CNQ at a 14.46% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.
- Does CNQ or POWL pay a bigger dividend?
- CNQ yields 2.89% and POWL yields 0.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CNQ or POWL more profitable?
- CNQ runs the higher net margin — CNQ at 23.94% versus POWL at 16.51%.
- Which has been the better investment, CNQ or POWL?
- Over the past 10-year, POWL delivered the higher annualized total return — CNQ at 17.67% versus POWL at 47.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Canadian Natural Resources P/E ratioPowell Industries P/E ratioCanadian Natural Resources dividend yieldPowell Industries dividend yieldCanadian Natural Resources ROEPowell Industries ROECanadian Natural Resources operating marginPowell Industries operating marginCanadian Natural Resources revenue growthPowell Industries revenue growthCanadian Natural Resources free cash flowPowell Industries free cash flow
Canadian Natural Resources & Powell Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.