Is CMS or RL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CMS is cheaper: CMS trades at a 20.16 P/E and RL at 26.74.

Which has grown faster, CMS or RL?

Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — CMS at a 5.66% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.

Does CMS or RL pay a bigger dividend?

CMS yields 3.02% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CMS or RL more profitable?

CMS runs the higher net margin — CMS at 12.55% versus RL at 11.60%.

Which has been the better investment, CMS or RL?

Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — CMS at 8.60% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

CMS and RL are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.

A side-by-side comparison of CMS Energy Corporation and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CMS

CMS Energy Corporation

$22.82B

$73.57Utilities

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$24.64B

$403.98Consumer Cyclical

Total return — CMS vs RL

growth of $100 · last 29y

CMS +111.2%RL +1182.5%RL compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CMS RL

CMS vs RL: by the numbers

•RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $22.82B market cap).
•CMS trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.16 vs 26.74 P/E).
•CMS converts more revenue to profit (12.55% vs 11.60% net margin).
•RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 5.66% CAGR).
•CMS pays the higher dividend yield (3.02% vs 0.90%).

Which is better, CMS or RL?

Metric tally: CMS 8 · RL 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCMS(lower P/E)

GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeCMS(higher dividend yield)

QualityRL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CMS	RL
P/E ratio	20.16●	26.74
Forward P/E	17.63●	22.03
P/S ratio	2.51●	3.10
P/B ratio	2.34●	8.86
PEG ratio	3.45	0.71●
EV / EBITDA	12.67●	22.22
FCF yield	—	2.96%

Profitability

Metric	CMS	RL
Gross margin	64.61%	69.87%●
Operating margin	19.53%●	14.53%
Net margin	12.55%●	11.60%
ROE	11.69%	33.13%●
ROIC	3.67%	19.62%●

Dividends

Metric	CMS	RL
Dividend yield	3.02%●	0.90%
Payout ratio	63.03%	23.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CMS	RL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.66%	13.01%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.90%	20.37%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-16.59%	22.25%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.28%	29.56%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CMS or RL?: It depends on your goal. value: CMS (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CMS (higher dividend yield); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is CMS or RL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CMS is cheaper: CMS trades at a 20.16 P/E and RL at 26.74.
Which has grown faster, CMS or RL?: Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — CMS at a 5.66% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
Does CMS or RL pay a bigger dividend?: CMS yields 3.02% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CMS or RL more profitable?: CMS runs the higher net margin — CMS at 12.55% versus RL at 11.60%.
Which has been the better investment, CMS or RL?: Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — CMS at 8.60% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CMS analysis Full RL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CMS Energy P/E ratio Ralph Lauren P/E ratio CMS Energy dividend yield Ralph Lauren dividend yield CMS Energy ROE Ralph Lauren ROE CMS Energy operating margin Ralph Lauren operating margin CMS Energy revenue growth Ralph Lauren revenue growth CMS Energy free cash flow Ralph Lauren free cash flow

CMS Energy & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.