Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF)
CMI leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cummins Inc. and Siemens Energy AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CMI vs SMEGF
growth of $100 · last 6yCMI +240.8%SMEGF +665.1%SMEGF compounded faster
CMI SMEGF
CMI vs SMEGF: by the numbers
- •SMEGF is the larger company ($167.76B vs $98.92B market cap).
- •CMI trades at the lower earnings multiple (37.24 vs 65.80 P/E).
- •CMI converts more revenue to profit (7.89% vs 6.15% net margin).
- •CMI grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.78% vs 7.98% CAGR).
- •CMI pays the higher dividend yield (1.12% vs 0.42%).
Which is better, CMI or SMEGF?
Metric tally: CMI 11 · SMEGF 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCMI(lower P/E)
GrowthCMI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCMI(higher dividend yield)
QualityCMI(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CMI | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 37.24● | 65.80 |
| Forward P/E | 24.68● | 32.61 |
| P/S ratio | 2.94● | 3.63 |
| P/B ratio | 8.06● | 13.69 |
| PEG ratio | 3.29 | 1.32● |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.65● | 29.43 |
| FCF yield | 2.68% | 4.18%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CMI | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 25.39%● | 18.82% |
| Operating margin | 11.24%● | 7.96% |
| Net margin | 7.89%● | 6.15% |
| ROE | 21.64% | 23.20%● |
| ROIC | 11.41%● | 9.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | CMI | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.12%● | 0.42% |
| Payout ratio | 38.80% | 36.48% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CMI | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.78%● | 7.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.31% | 45.13%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.25% | 47.34%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 28.17% | 45.66%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CMI or SMEGF?
- It depends on your goal. value: CMI (lower P/E); growth: CMI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CMI (higher dividend yield); quality: CMI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CMI leads 11 to 6.
- Is CMI or SMEGF cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CMI is cheaper: CMI trades at a 37.24 P/E and SMEGF at 65.80.
- Which has grown faster, CMI or SMEGF?
- Over the past five years, CMI grew revenue faster — CMI at a 10.78% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.98%.
- Does CMI or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?
- CMI yields 1.12% and SMEGF yields 0.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CMI or SMEGF more profitable?
- CMI runs the higher net margin — CMI at 7.89% versus SMEGF at 6.15%.
- Which has been the better investment, CMI or SMEGF?
- Over the past 5-year, SMEGF delivered the higher annualized total return — CMI at 23.31% versus SMEGF at 45.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cummins P/E ratioSiemens Energy AG P/E ratioCummins dividend yieldSiemens Energy AG dividend yieldCummins ROESiemens Energy AG ROECummins operating marginSiemens Energy AG operating marginCummins revenue growthSiemens Energy AG revenue growthCummins free cash flowSiemens Energy AG free cash flow
Cummins & Siemens Energy AG appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.