Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)
PH leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cummins Inc. and Parker-Hannifin Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CMI vs PH
growth of $100 · last 30yCMI +6316.1%PH +4888.8%CMI compounded faster
CMI PH
CMI vs PH: by the numbers
- •PH is the larger company ($113.92B vs $91.01B market cap).
- •PH trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.34 vs 34.26 P/E).
- •PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 7.89% net margin).
- •CMI grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.78% vs 9.15% CAGR).
- •CMI pays the higher dividend yield (1.21% vs 0.82%).
Which is better, CMI or PH?
Metric tally: CMI 6 · PH 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePH(lower P/E)
GrowthCMI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCMI(higher dividend yield)
QualityPH(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CMI | PH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.26 | 33.34● |
| Forward P/E | 22.72● | 26.53 |
| P/S ratio | 2.70● | 5.51 |
| P/B ratio | 7.41● | 7.92 |
| PEG ratio | 3.03 | 1.04● |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.20● | 23.13 |
| FCF yield | 2.92% | 3.18%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CMI | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 25.39% | 37.23%● |
| Operating margin | 11.24% | 20.87%● |
| Net margin | 7.89% | 16.58%● |
| ROE | 21.64% | 23.82%● |
| ROIC | 11.41% | 13.69%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CMI | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.21%● | 0.82% |
| Payout ratio | 38.80% | 26.89% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CMI | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.78%● | 9.15% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.31% | 24.00%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.25% | 8.25%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 24.28% | 26.11%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CMI or PH?
- It depends on your goal. value: PH (lower P/E); growth: CMI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CMI (higher dividend yield); quality: PH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PH leads 11 to 6.
- Is CMI or PH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper: CMI trades at a 34.26 P/E and PH at 33.34.
- Which has grown faster, CMI or PH?
- Over the past five years, CMI grew revenue faster — CMI at a 10.78% CAGR versus PH at 9.15%.
- Does CMI or PH pay a bigger dividend?
- CMI yields 1.21% and PH yields 0.82% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CMI or PH more profitable?
- PH runs the higher net margin — CMI at 7.89% versus PH at 16.58%.
- Which has been the better investment, CMI or PH?
- Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — CMI at 22.09% versus PH at 25.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cummins P/E ratioParker-Hannifin P/E ratioCummins dividend yieldParker-Hannifin dividend yieldCummins ROEParker-Hannifin ROECummins operating marginParker-Hannifin operating marginCummins revenue growthParker-Hannifin revenue growthCummins free cash flowParker-Hannifin free cash flow
Cummins & Parker-Hannifin appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.