Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs Eaton Corporation plc (ETN)
CMI leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cummins Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CMI vs ETN
growth of $100 · last 30yCMI +6297.5%ETN +2981.8%CMI compounded faster
CMI ETN
CMI vs ETN: by the numbers
- •ETN is the larger company ($151.98B vs $91.01B market cap).
- •CMI trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.26 vs 38.26 P/E).
- •ETN converts more revenue to profit (13.99% vs 7.89% net margin).
- •CMI grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.78% vs 9.94% CAGR).
- •CMI pays the higher dividend yield (1.21% vs 1.09%).
Which is better, CMI or ETN?
Metric tally: CMI 9 · ETN 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCMI(lower P/E)
GrowthCMI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCMI(higher dividend yield)
QualityETN(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CMI | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.26● | 38.26 |
| Forward P/E | 22.71● | 24.99 |
| P/S ratio | 2.70● | 5.34 |
| P/B ratio | 7.41● | 7.71 |
| PEG ratio | 3.03 | 3.04 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.20● | 27.86 |
| FCF yield | 2.92% | 3.08%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CMI | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 25.39% | 36.89%● |
| Operating margin | 11.24% | 18.13%● |
| Net margin | 7.89% | 13.99%● |
| ROE | 21.64%● | 20.19% |
| ROIC | 11.41% | 13.14%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CMI | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.21%● | 1.09% |
| Payout ratio | 38.80% | 40.80% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CMI | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.78%● | 9.94% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.31% | 24.48%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.25% | 13.57%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 24.28%● | 23.64% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CMI or ETN?
- It depends on your goal. value: CMI (lower P/E); growth: CMI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CMI (higher dividend yield); quality: ETN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CMI leads 9 to 7.
- Is CMI or ETN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CMI is cheaper: CMI trades at a 34.26 P/E and ETN at 38.26.
- Which has grown faster, CMI or ETN?
- Over the past five years, CMI grew revenue faster — CMI at a 10.78% CAGR versus ETN at 9.94%.
- Does CMI or ETN pay a bigger dividend?
- CMI yields 1.21% and ETN yields 1.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CMI or ETN more profitable?
- ETN runs the higher net margin — CMI at 7.89% versus ETN at 13.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, CMI or ETN?
- Over the past 10-year, ETN delivered the higher annualized total return — CMI at 22.09% versus ETN at 23.24%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cummins P/E ratioEaton P/E ratioCummins dividend yieldEaton dividend yieldCummins ROEEaton ROECummins operating marginEaton operating marginCummins revenue growthEaton revenue growthCummins free cash flowEaton free cash flow
Cummins & Eaton appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.