CME Group Inc. (CME) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC)
MMC leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of CME Group Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CME
CME Group Inc.
$269.53Financial Services
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$171.14Financial Services
Total return — CME vs MMC
growth of $100 · last 23yCME +3423.0%MMC +287.5%CME compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CME MMC
CME vs MMC: by the numbers
- •CME is the larger company ($97.67B vs $89.82B market cap).
- •MMC trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.30 vs 23.00 P/E).
- •CME converts more revenue to profit (62.77% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •MMC grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.28% vs 7.93% CAGR).
- •MMC pays the higher dividend yield (2.10% vs 1.41%).
Which is better, CME or MMC?
Metric tally: CME 6 · MMC 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMMC(lower P/E)
GrowthMMC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMMC(higher dividend yield)
QualityMMC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CME | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 23.00 | 20.30● |
| Forward P/E | 20.93 | 16.60● |
| P/S ratio | 14.49 | 3.11● |
| P/B ratio | 3.68● | 5.48 |
| PEG ratio | 1.58● | 7.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.39 | 14.59● |
| FCF yield | 4.42% | 5.96%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CME | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 86.34%● | 20.12% |
| Operating margin | 65.57%● | 21.70% |
| Net margin | 62.77%● | 14.26% |
| ROE | 15.94% | 26.51%● |
| ROIC | 1.62% | 12.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CME | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 2.10%● |
| Payout ratio | 33.99% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CME | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.93% | 9.28%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 13.72% | 16.34%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 12.73%● | 8.27% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 8.64% | 10.12%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CME or MMC?
- It depends on your goal. value: MMC (lower P/E); growth: MMC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MMC (higher dividend yield); quality: MMC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MMC leads 11 to 6.
- Is CME or MMC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MMC is cheaper: CME trades at a 23.00 P/E and MMC at 20.30.
- Which has grown faster, CME or MMC?
- Over the past five years, MMC grew revenue faster — CME at a 7.93% CAGR versus MMC at 9.28%.
- Does CME or MMC pay a bigger dividend?
- CME yields 1.41% and MMC yields 2.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CME or MMC more profitable?
- CME runs the higher net margin — CME at 62.77% versus MMC at 14.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, CME or MMC?
- Over the past 10-year, CME delivered the higher annualized total return — CME at 15.04% versus MMC at 13.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CME P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioCME dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldCME ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROECME operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginCME revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthCME free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
CME & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.