The Clorox Company (CLX) vs Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR)
CLX leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Clorox Company and Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CLX
The Clorox Company
$95.38Consumer Defensive
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
$37.94Consumer Defensive
Total return — CLX vs TR
growth of $100 · last 30yCLX +354.2%TR +434.4%TR compounded faster
CLX TR
CLX vs TR: by the numbers
- •CLX is the larger company ($11.53B vs $2.85B market cap).
- •CLX trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.48 vs 27.90 P/E).
- •TR converts more revenue to profit (13.55% vs 11.18% net margin).
- •TR grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.35% vs -2.11% CAGR).
- •CLX pays the higher dividend yield (5.20% vs 0.95%).
Which is better, CLX or TR?
Metric tally: CLX 10 · TR 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCLX(lower P/E)
GrowthTR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCLX(higher dividend yield)
QualityCLX(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLX | TR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 15.48● | 27.90 |
| Forward P/E | 15.40● | 27.00 |
| P/S ratio | 1.72● | 3.87 |
| P/B ratio | 36.70 | 3.00● |
| PEG ratio | 0.10● | 1.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.38● | 17.43 |
| FCF yield | 3.27% | 3.47%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CLX | TR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 43.85%● | 35.37% |
| Operating margin | 15.68%● | 14.14% |
| Net margin | 11.18% | 13.55%● |
| ROE | 252.34%● | 10.50% |
| ROIC | 24.10%● | 6.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLX | TR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.20%● | 0.95% |
| Payout ratio | 75.61% | 26.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLX | TR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.11% | 9.35%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.54% | 11.64%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -21.87% | 11.48%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.09% | 6.89%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CLX or TR?
- It depends on your goal. value: CLX (lower P/E); growth: TR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CLX (higher dividend yield); quality: CLX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CLX leads 10 to 7.
- Is CLX or TR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CLX is cheaper: CLX trades at a 15.48 P/E and TR at 27.90.
- Which has grown faster, CLX or TR?
- Over the past five years, TR grew revenue faster — CLX at a -2.11% CAGR versus TR at 9.35%.
- Does CLX or TR pay a bigger dividend?
- CLX yields 5.20% and TR yields 0.95% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CLX or TR more profitable?
- TR runs the higher net margin — CLX at 11.18% versus TR at 13.55%.
- Which has been the better investment, CLX or TR?
- Over the past 10-year, TR delivered the higher annualized total return — CLX at -0.51% versus TR at 4.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Clorox P/E ratioTootsie Roll Industries P/E ratioClorox dividend yieldTootsie Roll Industries dividend yieldClorox ROETootsie Roll Industries ROEClorox operating marginTootsie Roll Industries operating marginClorox revenue growthTootsie Roll Industries revenue growthClorox free cash flowTootsie Roll Industries free cash flow
Clorox & Tootsie Roll Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.