Which has grown faster, CLS or TTWO?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus TTWO at 14.57%.

Is CLS or TTWO more profitable?

CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus TTWO at -4.48%.

Which has been the better investment, CLS or TTWO?

Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 44.19% versus TTWO at 20.23%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO)

CLS leads on 12 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

$45.69B

$246.10Technology

Total return — CLS vs TTWO

growth of $100 · last 28y

CLS +3747.9%TTWO +6457.7%TTWO compounded faster

CLS TTWO

CLS vs TTWO: by the numbers

•TTWO is the larger company ($45.69B vs $40.79B market cap).
•CLS is profitable (6.95% net margin) while TTWO runs a net loss (-4.48%).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.51% vs 14.57% CAGR).

Which is better, CLS or TTWO?

Metric tally: CLS 12 · TTWO 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthCLS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCLS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	TTWO
P/E ratio	43.57	—
Forward P/E	36.32●	64.32
P/S ratio	3.02●	7.00
P/B ratio	20.38	13.27●
PEG ratio	0.39	—
EV / EBITDA	33.41●	38.51
FCF yield	1.18%●	0.97%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	TTWO
Gross margin	11.61%	57.23%●
Operating margin	7.84%●	-0.88%
Net margin	6.95%●	-4.48%
ROE	46.86%●	-8.49%
ROIC	27.74%●	-1.24%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	TTWO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.51%●	14.57%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%●	37.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.52%●	-11.80%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	116.83%●	8.05%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CLS or TTWO?: It depends on your goal. growth: CLS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CLS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CLS leads 12 to 2.
Which has grown faster, CLS or TTWO?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus TTWO at 14.57%.
Is CLS or TTWO more profitable?: CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus TTWO at -4.48%.
Which has been the better investment, CLS or TTWO?: Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 44.19% versus TTWO at 20.23%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full TTWO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Take-Two Interactive Software P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield Take-Two Interactive Software dividend yield Celestica ROE Take-Two Interactive Software ROE Celestica operating margin Take-Two Interactive Software operating margin Celestica revenue growth Take-Two Interactive Software revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Take-Two Interactive Software free cash flow

Celestica & Take-Two Interactive Software appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.