Is CLS or SQ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CLS is cheaper: CLS trades at a 44.99 P/E and SQ at 49.81.

Which has grown faster, CLS or SQ?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus SQ at 13.19%.

Is CLS or SQ more profitable?

CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus SQ at -2.04%.

Which has been the better investment, CLS or SQ?

Over the past 5-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 43.02% versus SQ at 4.50%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Block, Inc. (SQ)

CLS leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Block, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — CLS vs SQ

growth of $100 · last 9y

CLS +994.3%SQ +578.4%CLS compounded faster

CLS SQ

CLS vs SQ: by the numbers

•SQ is the larger company ($51.73B vs $42.83B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower earnings multiple (44.99 vs 49.81 P/E).
•CLS is profitable (6.95% net margin) while SQ runs a net loss (-2.04%).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.51% vs 13.19% CAGR).

Which is better, CLS or SQ?

Metric tally: CLS 9 · SQ 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCLS(lower P/E)

GrowthCLS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCLS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	SQ
P/E ratio	44.99●	49.81
Forward P/E	37.36	—
P/S ratio	3.12	2.35●
P/B ratio	21.04	2.82●
PEG ratio	0.39●	696.22
EV / EBITDA	31.98	26.61●
FCF yield	1.14%	1.28%●

Profitability

Metric	CLS	SQ
Gross margin	11.61%	44.85%●
Operating margin	7.84%●	4.93%
Net margin	6.95%●	-2.04%
ROE	46.86%●	-2.30%
ROIC	27.74%●	-12.82%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	SQ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.51%●	13.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%●	34.72%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.52%	64.00%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	116.87%●	4.50%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CLS or SQ?: It depends on your goal. value: CLS (lower P/E); growth: CLS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CLS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CLS leads 9 to 6.
Is CLS or SQ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CLS is cheaper: CLS trades at a 44.99 P/E and SQ at 49.81.
Which has grown faster, CLS or SQ?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus SQ at 13.19%.
Is CLS or SQ more profitable?: CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus SQ at -2.04%.
Which has been the better investment, CLS or SQ?: Over the past 5-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 43.02% versus SQ at 4.50%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full SQ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Block P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield Block dividend yield Celestica ROE Block ROE Celestica operating margin Block operating margin Celestica revenue growth Block revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Block free cash flow

Celestica & Block appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.