Is CLS or GRMN cheaper?

On trailing earnings, GRMN is cheaper: CLS trades at a 44.99 P/E and GRMN at 26.11.

Which has grown faster, CLS or GRMN?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus GRMN at 11.13%.

Does CLS or GRMN pay a bigger dividend?

GRMN pays a dividend (1.60% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.

Is CLS or GRMN more profitable?

GRMN runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus GRMN at 23.26%.

Which has been the better investment, CLS or GRMN?

Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 43.02% versus GRMN at 21.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Garmin Ltd. (GRMN)

CLS and GRMN are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Garmin Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — CLS vs GRMN

growth of $100 · last 26y

CLS +451.9%GRMN +2242.0%GRMN compounded faster

CLS GRMN

CLS vs GRMN: by the numbers

•GRMN is the larger company ($45.17B vs $42.83B market cap).
•GRMN trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.11 vs 44.99 P/E).
•GRMN converts more revenue to profit (23.26% vs 6.95% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.51% vs 11.13% CAGR).
•GRMN pays a dividend (1.60% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CLS or GRMN?

Metric tally: CLS 8 · GRMN 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGRMN(lower P/E)

GrowthCLS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCLS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	GRMN
P/E ratio	44.99	26.11●
Forward P/E	37.36	24.29●
P/S ratio	3.12●	6.07
P/B ratio	21.04	4.89●
PEG ratio	0.39●	1.34
EV / EBITDA	31.98	18.87●
FCF yield	1.14%	3.20%●

Profitability

Metric	CLS	GRMN
Gross margin	11.61%	59.14%●
Operating margin	7.84%	26.46%●
Net margin	6.95%	23.26%●
ROE	46.86%●	18.73%
ROIC	27.74%●	16.71%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	GRMN
Dividend yield	—	1.60%
Payout ratio	—	43.35%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	GRMN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.51%●	11.13%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%●	9.55%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.52%●	5.80%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	116.87%●	13.32%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CLS or GRMN?: It depends on your goal. value: GRMN (lower P/E); growth: CLS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CLS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is CLS or GRMN cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GRMN is cheaper: CLS trades at a 44.99 P/E and GRMN at 26.11.
Which has grown faster, CLS or GRMN?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus GRMN at 11.13%.
Does CLS or GRMN pay a bigger dividend?: GRMN pays a dividend (1.60% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.
Is CLS or GRMN more profitable?: GRMN runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus GRMN at 23.26%.
Which has been the better investment, CLS or GRMN?: Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 43.02% versus GRMN at 21.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full GRMN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Garmin P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield Garmin dividend yield Celestica ROE Garmin ROE Celestica operating margin Garmin operating margin Celestica revenue growth Garmin revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Garmin free cash flow

Celestica & Garmin appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.