Is CLS or GFS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CLS is cheaper: CLS trades at a 44.99 P/E and GFS at 61.75.

Which has grown faster, CLS or GFS?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus GFS at 6.81%.

Does CLS or GFS pay a bigger dividend?

GFS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.

Is CLS or GFS more profitable?

GFS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus GFS at 11.37%.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS)

GFS leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics, though CLS is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — CLS vs GFS

growth of $100 · last 5y

CLS +3697.7%GFS +85.0%CLS compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CLS GFS

CLS vs GFS: by the numbers

•GFS is the larger company ($47.07B vs $42.83B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower earnings multiple (44.99 vs 61.75 P/E).
•GFS converts more revenue to profit (11.37% vs 6.95% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.51% vs 6.81% CAGR).
•GFS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CLS or GFS?

Metric tally: CLS 6 · GFS 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCLS(lower P/E)

GrowthCLS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCLS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	GFS
P/E ratio	44.99●	61.75
Forward P/E	37.36●	45.32
P/S ratio	3.12●	7.04
P/B ratio	21.04	4.12●
PEG ratio	0.39	—
EV / EBITDA	31.98	21.96●
FCF yield	1.14%	2.23%●

Profitability

Metric	CLS	GFS
Gross margin	11.61%	26.40%●
Operating margin	7.84%	12.08%●
Net margin	6.95%	11.37%●
ROE	46.86%●	6.65%
ROIC	27.74%●	5.20%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	GFS
Dividend yield	—	0.14%
Payout ratio	—	7.55%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	GFS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.51%●	6.81%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.52%	45.78%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	116.87%	—

Frequently asked

Which is better, CLS or GFS?: It depends on your goal. value: CLS (lower P/E); growth: CLS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CLS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GFS leads 7 to 6.
Is CLS or GFS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CLS is cheaper: CLS trades at a 44.99 P/E and GFS at 61.75.
Which has grown faster, CLS or GFS?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus GFS at 6.81%.
Does CLS or GFS pay a bigger dividend?: GFS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.
Is CLS or GFS more profitable?: GFS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus GFS at 11.37%.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full GFS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio GLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield GLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yield Celestica ROE GLOBALFOUNDRIES ROE Celestica operating margin GLOBALFOUNDRIES operating margin Celestica revenue growth GLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growth Celestica free cash flow GLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow

Celestica & GLOBALFOUNDRIES appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.